Search
Events Calendar
«  »
SMTWTFS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Issue 6-09 - EDITOR'S NOTES

publication date: Mar 3, 2008
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
Like contracts, bid proposals are subject to opinions and interpretations. In this week’s first case, a low bidder was deemed nonresponsive after the public owner found that the bidder did not submit all of the forms required in the bid documents. Instead, the bidder substituted the proffered corporate resolution form with its own standard form. Because state law and a precedent case determined that even "informalities" such as this could not be waived, the bidder’s protest was denied.

Differing document interpretations are also at the heart of the next two cases. By altering the contract’s standard arbitration clause, the parties opened themselves up for a legal dispute when the project ran into trouble. And, a subcontract that incorporated certain clauses from the prime contract created problems on a fixed-price contract when differing site conditions arose.

Finally, Dr. William Ibbs concludes this issue with a review of the statistics associated with cumulative impact—how change can impact a project—as well as how the elements and project players factor into that impact. His insights regarding change and labor productivity are particularly revealing, plus his own independent statistics lend support to the controversial Leonard study.


This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits


Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.

Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.


Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.