EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 6-49
publication date: Dec 14, 2008
Anyone who has passed the first grade knows that 2 + 2 = 4. Likewise, with a little deciphering (and junior high math skills), the following equation also makes sense: (.25) (2) (24) = 12; (12) ($280) = $3,360. But, while we know that if you have two apples and add two more, the answer is clear, how does the latter equation relate to a photo of three concrete barriers in a grassy median? That was one of the questions that lingered in the minds of the ASBCA panel members when they received a written appeal from a contractor working on an Army restoration project. The contractor omitted descriptions that would have helped the board determine if the contractor’s costs for “changed conditions” were valid. Had the contractor opted to include a hearing with its written appeal, the ruling could have gone a different way.
On a bid protest of a state turnpike project, an electrical contractor protested that the project violated the state Separations Act, which mandates separate trade contracts for public building projects. The opinion given by the appeals court contemplated what constitutes a “public building,” but ultimately says the protest was premature because a formal bid solicitation had not yet been issued.
When it comes to settlement negotiations, good business practice dictates that all parties are aware of and on board with the agreement. A contractor made a deal with a disgruntled subcontractor, committing its surety to payment if it defaulted. However, the surety was left out of the discussions. Too many questions remained unanswered for the court to issue a decision and the case was remanded.
It is a rare situation when a construction project does not experience some sort of delay. Whether a delay is caused by late material deliveries, weather, mismanagement, coordination disputes or some other reasons, a delay can wreak havoc on a project. Even when a contract contains a no-damage-for-delay clause, Larry True advises that preparing for a delay claim is in the contractor’s best interest. We conclude this week’s issue with his primer on how to prepare for such a claim.
This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click
here
Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits
Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.
Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.
Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.
