Search
Events Calendar
«  »
SMTWTFS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 
You are here: Home » News » EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 6-20

EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 6-20

publication date: May 18, 2008
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
By most standards, two years of inactivity on a project would be enough for an owner to conclude that the contractor has walked off the job. If the contractor hasn’t received payment for any of its work, however, the contractor could reasonably think that the owner has defaulted. What remains in this dispute, as presented in this week’s first case, is what date to put on the mechanic’s lien. Does the date coincide with the beginning of the project or when the contractor returns to finish the work two years later? Here, the answer hinges on a 120-day mechanic’s lien filing deadline.

Also this week, we present a bid protest decision in which the GAO awards the costs for a bid protest to the protester, despite the fact that it was only successful in part of its protest. And, a state appeals court addresses the ramifications of a no-damage-for-delay clause in a subcontract for a roadway project.


This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits


Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.

Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.


Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.