EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 6-24
publication date: Jun 15, 2008
Merriam-Webster defines the term “nickel-and-dime” as, “To impair, weaken or defeat piecemeal (as through a series of small incursions or excessive attention to minor details).” The idea of nickel and diming someone is not new. It pervades our lives in many areas—the new airline charges for baggage fees and preferred seat assignments, hotel fees, phone line item charges, loan and bank fees, hospitality services, school fees and fundraisers, and especially legal costs. States have tried to minimize this money-wasting approach to litigation on government projects by requiring claimants to consolidate all claims into a single action. A state high court ruled that despite a waiver of sovereign immunity, a contractor could not file multiple claims in separate actions against a government agency if the claims were all known at the onset of the first action. The waiver only applies to consolidated claims, it said in this week’s first case.
On another government contract, a contractor failed to conduct sufficient research on performance specifications before submitting its bid. When it came time to fulfill the specifications, it realized its costs and procurement timelines were significantly greater than anticipated.
The final case this week covers liability limitations and indirect damages related to engineering services for site preparation work. It also considers legal jurisdiction when the disputing parties cross state lines.
This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click
here
Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits
Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.
Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.
Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.
