SPLICED RAILS CANNOT BE SUBSTITUTED FOR UNSPLICED RAILS
publication date: Feb 29, 2004
In this case, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) combined two appeals (arising from the same contract) and issued a single decision denying both appeals. In the first case, “the Splicing Issue,” Valenzuela Engineering, Inc. (“Valenzuela”) appealed from the contracting officer’s deemed denial of a claim for an equitable adjustment of over $70,000 and 52 days. In the second case, “Liquidated Damages,” Valenzuela appealed from the contracting officer’s demand for $184,000.00 in liquidated damages.
This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click
here
Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits
Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.
Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.
Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.
