Search
Events Calendar
«  »
SMTWTFS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

PREVAILING PARTY DENIED ATTORNEYS FEES (UNDER EAJA) BECAUSE OPPOSING PARTY'S POSITION WAS SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED

publication date: Feb 29, 2004
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) denied an application for attorneys’ fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) because the opposing party proved that its position in the prior appeal was substantially justified, making the award unjust.


This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits


Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.

Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.


Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.