Search
Events Calendar
«  »
SMTWTFS
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829 

EDITOR'S NOTES | Volume 7 - Number 5

publication date: Feb 2, 2009
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
It’s not every day that a contractor can successfully argue for compensation of lost potential profits, even if that lost revenue was a direct result of a wrongfully terminated public contract. In the culmination of a dispute that the Advisor originally presented two years ago, the Colorado Supreme Court overturned an appellate ruling by determining that the contractor could pursue prospective lost profits that occurred because of its lost bonding capacity.

This week’s second case is a twist on a perpetual problem in the construction industry – verbal contracts. In this latest iteration, a subcontractor proposed using a standard AIA contract, but the parties never actually signed it. When a jobsite injury occurred that gave rise to a lawsuit against the prime contractor, it relied on the contract for indemnity. The court, however, said the argument failed because the contract was never signed.

The final case is a lesson in following directions. When considered as a whole, a bid proposal for an Army Corps of Engineers project contained the information requested by the RFP. But, it lacked the certified documentation required by the solicitation and was therefore rejected as technically unacceptable.


This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits


Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.

Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.


Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.