Search
Events Calendar
«  »
SMTWTFS
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829 
You are here: Home » News » EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 7-8

EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 7-8

publication date: Feb 23, 2009
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
Every business has some type of customer service policy. For some, the customer is always right. Others employ the “we’re not happy until you’re happy” methodology. And unfortunately, too many companies have an unwritten policy that assumes the customer is usually wrong, or worse, always lies. Regardless of the service philosophy, what happens when a customer isn’t satisfied with a product or the service falls short of the expectation or promise? Or, what are the payment obligations when the actual cost of a service far exceeds the estimate? Both issues are at the heart of this week’s first case. A contractor hired a consultant to negotiate an equitable adjustment on a construction project, but the consultant failed to deliver on promises made. The contractor stopped paying the consultant’s invoices, which significantly exceeded the original estimate, and the consultant sued for monies owed plus interest. Because the contractor did not have a written contract with the consultant, the contractor was liable for the entire amount, not just the estimate.

Next, a Texas appeals court ruled that substantial completion of a project was insufficient for release of a contractual retainer. Only the certified final completion and submission of all close-out documents could trigger the contractor’s right to that payment.

In the third case, a contracting officer improperly terminated a contractor after denying its requests for time extensions related to a differing site condition on a solid waste removal project.

We conclude this issue with a look at the problem-laden Clark County (Nev.) Regional Justice Center. The parties, Clark County and A.F. Construction, engaged in a 10-week arbitration that resulted in a 195-page decision that ultimately netted a $52.7 million recovery for the contractor. Construction Claims Advisor obtained a copy of the decision from the county, and then interviewed the lead counsel for A.F. Construction and its surety.



This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits


Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.

Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.


Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.