EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 7-11
publication date: Mar 16, 2009
Critical path scheduling has long been an integral tool of the construction process. It enumerates all the activities necessary to complete a project, the time required to complete each activity and the dependencies between them. When project delays compromise the critical path, the management team must exercise good faith in determining appropriate costs and liabilities, especially when concurrent delays are involved. That decision cannot be a random assignment of culpability. This week’s first case considers the decision of a contractor to assign all delay liabilities to one subcontractor, despite evidence that showed more than one party was responsible for the project’s delays.
The second case is a lesson in fiscal responsibility as well as the definition of a prevailing party in a mechanic’s lien. The attorney fees and costs for one party were more than three times the amount of the disputed lien!
And third, a subcontractor working under two separate contracts on one project could only collect payment on one of the contracts. Because the owner went bankrupt, the prime contractor did not receive payment. As a result, the sub was also denied payment for the work performed on the second contract, which contained a pay-if-paid clause. The first contract omitted this clause.
This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click
here
Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits
Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.
Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.
Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.
