Search
Events Calendar
«  »
SMTWTFS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 9-9

publication date: Feb 27, 2011
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.

If a bid on a public contract is not complete or does not conform to the solicitation, it is considered nonresponsive and must be rejected. But, what if the nonconformity results from government mishandling of the bid package? That was the apparent situation in a recent bid on a federal contract. The bid was rejected because it was accompanied by only a photocopy of the bid bond, not the signed original. The disappointed bidder cried foul.

The bidder submitted sworn statements from its employees and from the surety saying the original bid bond had been included in the submittal. The bidder theorized that the government contracting officer accidentally lost or destroyed the original. But it was to no avail. There was no remedy for an isolated act of government negligence.

Other cases this week involved the application of a state workers’ compensation law to an Indian contractor operating on tribal land and a suspension of work resulting from import restrictions imposed by a host foreign government. The state workers’ comp law applied on the tribal land. And, the suspension of work could be compensable if it resulted from the U.S. government’s inept administration of the material approval process.



This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits


Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.

Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.


Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.