Search
Events Calendar
«  »
SMTWTFS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 9-27

publication date: Jul 11, 2011
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.

When one thinks of construction scheduling, an objective, well-defined schedule is contemplated. Frequently, a critical path of activities is spelled out. It is surprising in this day and age that not all construction contracts include an objective schedule. One still sees contracts in which the contractor is required to work “diligently” or “expeditiously” and is instructed to perform “at the direction of” the project owner or prime contractor.

Parties are often comfortable with an ill-defined schedule. One reason is the belief that without an objectively stated schedule, there can be no liability for delay damages. This assumption is a fallacy.

In a recent case, a subcontract required the sub to “prosecute the work in a prompt and diligent manner whenever the work or any part of it becomes available.” The subcontractor was aware, however, of the prime contract schedule, including a planned seasonal shutdown of the sub’s portion of the work. The subcontractor mobilized one month after the site became available. When the prime contractor subsequently sought delay damages from the sub, the sub
argued that without a performance schedule in the subcontract, there could be no liability for delay damages. The subcontractor lost the argument.

Other cases this week involved the ability of a site preparation contractor to lien the property and a contractor’s right to seek indemnification from a geotechnical engineer. The site contractor’s work was “incidental to the construction of a building” even though the planned structure was never built. The contractor could lien the property. And, the contractor’s claim against the engineer was not barred by a statute of limitation because the contractual right to indemnification did not arise until the contractor settled a claim against it by the project owner.

Note: Twice a year – once in the summer and once at the end of the year – Construction Claims Advisor skips a week of publication. We skipped the week of July 4 as we celebrated our nation’s independence. The editorial staff at Construction Claims Advisor wish you a happy (belated) Fourth of July and a successful summer.



This page is available to members only.
To subscribe, click here

Construction Claims Online Features and Benefits


Whether your role in the construction claims process is as a building owner, designer, contractor, facility manager, attorney or consultant, you will want to keep up with the latest developments in construction law, federal and state policy, construction process and best practices.

Whether you sign up for our free or paid content, Construction Claims Online provides information you need to achieve successful outcomes for project issues and your clients' best interests.


Avoid costly errors by understanding how the boards and courts look at typical disputes situations.
Achieve successful project outcomes.
Defend against unsubstantiated claims.
Reduce or eliminate risks.