Construction Claims Reference Library
Sample Issue
Past Issues
Home
Resources
Sample Issue
Construction Claims Reference Library
Bookstore
Editorial Board
Construction Law Sites
Past Issues
Press Releases
Forums
Subscribe
Login Here
Email
Password
Remember Me
Join Now
Forgotten Password
Search
Events Calendar
«
February 2012
»
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
You are here:
Home
»
Volume 6 - Number 46 | November 24, 2008
Volume 6 - Number 46 | November 24, 2008
Recent Issues
EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 6-46
Last week, we brought you a case in which a mistyped e-mail address was to blame for a late bid submission. This week, a corrupt e-mail attachment is the culprit in a similar case. In this age of increased dependence on technology for day-to-day business interactions, these cases serve as good reminders to never put blind trust in technology’s reliability, especially when your business is on the line. Timely follow-up, the old-fashioned way, will never go out of style.
Because technology has expanded our abilities to communicate with the world, the business world has become much smaller, figuratively speaking. When a foreign company presents the low bid on a federal government project, should that organization be subject to the same regulations that apply to domestic firms? That is the question alluded to, but left unanswered in a bid protest involving a foreign low bidder twice reprimanded by its own government for bid rigging.
This week’s final case pits an unpaid contractor against a public entity on a mechanic’s lien. The work was performed on private property that was subsequently conveyed to a public interest. As a result, the mechanic’s lien failed.
ELECTRONIC BID FOILED BY CORRUPT FILE ATTACHMENT
A corrupted e-mail file is the culprit for a contractor’s late bid submission. Despite the contractor’s attempt to send the e-mailed bid on time, the agency is not to blame for late delivery of the documents.
FOREIGN COMPANY DEEMED RESPONSIBLE DESPITE PRIOR BID RIGGING
An unanswered question in a federal claims case and a foreign bidder's responsibility may leave contractors wondering if FAR rules don't apply to foreign bidders.
LIEN COULD NOT ATTACH TO PRIVATELY FINANCED 1 USE PROPERTY
An improved private property conveyed to a public entity is exempt from a mechanic’s lien. Had the lien been filed before public conveyance and use, the lien could have attached to the property.