|
Volume 6 - Number 27 | July 7, 2008
|
EDITOR'S NOTES
Changes orders are an expected part of the construction process. Owners change their minds about details midway through a project and accommodations must be made. In the case of a science building in Bethesda, Md., when the government scientists who were destined to occupy the building realized there was a $15 million budget surplus, they started demanding upgrades to “their” building, including an entire new floor. The surplus turned into a bottomless pit and the change orders resulted in more than 200 contract modifications by the time the project reached substantial completion. The ruling over cumulative impacts by the federal claims court is a significant win for the contractor.
When submitting a bid, it pays to pay attention to the details of the request for proposals. The next two cases resulted in two contractors’ failures to read and adhere to the requirements. In one, the low bidder was rejected because the next lowest bidder factored in a key element—an expedited project delivery date. And in the other, a contractor violated state wage statutes too many times to qualify for the project.
And finally, a contractor delivered a faulty roof and was held liable for its demolition and replacement, which totaled more than the market value of the entire building.
|
|
