Home | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Construction Claims Online The Leading Web Resource for Those Involved in the Business of Avoiding, Managing, and Resolving Construction Disputes
Search This Site

Advanced Search

Browse Claims Library


Subscribe
Current Issue
Past Issues
Sample Issue
Bookstore
Directory
Links
Press Releases
Editorial Calendar
Editorial Board

FREE NEWSLETTER!

January 9, 2006

EDITOR'S NOTES

The late Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., said, “Men must turn square corners when they deal with the Government.” This week’s cases take those square corners to heart, delivering narrow opinions in all four cases. In our first case, a contractor misses the deadline to file a proposed termination settlement. Creative arguments do not net it a win with the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. Same goes for a contractor who tried to win three days worth of prejudgment interest from an appeals court after settling its dispute in mediation. Economic loss arguments and tort claims don’t go together for the justices of Ohio’s high court. And, South Carolina’s high court takes a narrow view in determining an “occurrence” in a CGL policy.

Subscribers: click here for the full story

Non-Subscribers: click here to subscribe