Home | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Construction Claims Online The Leading Web Resource for Those Involved in the Business of Avoiding, Managing, and Resolving Construction Disputes
Search This Site

Advanced Search

Browse Claims Library


Subscribe
Current Issue
Past Issues
Sample Issue
Bookstore
Directory
Links
Press Releases
Editorial Calendar
Editorial Board

FREE NEWSLETTER!

January 28, 2008

EDITOR'S NOTES

English author Douglas Adams said, “I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.” The novelist, best known for The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, had a habitual problem with deadlines and was once confined to a hotel suite for three weeks to ensure that he met his editor’s deadline. Although those measures may seem a little harsh, contract deadlines are not something to take lightly. If a contract demands a 45-day deadline, the parties would do well to adhere to that deadline unless both sides agree to a different arrangement. When it comes to filing and responding to claims, the deadlines are usually immovable. Miss the deadline and you stand a good chance of forfeiting your claim. Such was the case with the surety that missed its response deadline on a payment bond issue by three days. Unlike deadlines, which have hard and fast rules, many other aspects of business are not so rigid. For example, when a contract is terminated for convenience, the contractor can add up the total of incurred costs, including unsubmitted claims, for compensation. Also this week, general liability policies were not intended to cover a contractor’s defective work. However, they can cover defective work performed by a subcontractor. And finally, prevailing status does not necessarily go to the party that has the biggest cumulative award of all cases and claims related to a contract—it is decided on a case-by-case basis.

Subscribers: click here for the full story

Non-Subscribers: click here to subscribe