Home | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Construction Claims Online The Leading Web Resource for Those Involved in the Business of Avoiding, Managing, and Resolving Construction Disputes
Search This Site

Advanced Search

Browse Claims Library


Subscribe
Current Issue
Past Issues
Sample Issue
Bookstore
Directory
Links
Press Releases
Editorial Calendar
Editorial Board

FREE NEWSLETTER!

June 23, 2008

EDITOR'S NOTES

Self-employers are often the last people paid on a job. Subcontractors, suppliers, utilities and Uncle Sam must all get their cuts. Stiff the subcontractors and you face the threat of felony theft by contractor, as a two-person construction firm found out. They paid themselves out of the owner’s loan draw on a home remodeling project but failed to pay their subcontractors a proportionate amount. This first case, which appeared before a state supreme court, did not assign guilt to the husband and wife team; rather, it determined that there was probable cause.

In this week’s second case, a court subtly showed that not all parties in claims disputes are held to the same standard. The contractor altered the owner’s plans and specifications in the contract documents. Because one of the owners had a law degree, the court chided her for not paying closer attention to the contract and consequently denied that portion of the owners’ dispute.

Ambiguity is a concept that appears repeatedly in contract disputes. In a recent ASBCA appeal, the board compared contract documents to the project’s plans and specifications to determine that no ambiguity existed.

Subscribers: click here for the full story

Non-Subscribers: click here to subscribe