Events Calendar
« »
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
|
Sitemap
-
Volume 8 - Number 10 | March 8, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 9 | March 1, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 8 | February 22, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 7 | February 15, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 6 | February 8, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 5 | February 1, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 4 | January 25, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 3 | January 18, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 2 | January 11, 2010
-
Volume 8 - Number 1 | January 4, 2010
-
Volume 7 - Number 50 | December 21, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 49 | December 14, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 48 | December 7, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 47 | November 30, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 46 | November 23, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 45 | November 16, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 44 | November 9, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 43 | November 2, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 42 | October 26, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 41 | October 19, 2009
-
Arbitration, Mediation & Dispute Resolution
-
Volume 7 - Number 40 | October 12, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 39 | October 5, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 38 | September 28, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 37 | September 21, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 36 | September 14, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 35 | August 31, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 34 | August 24, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 33 | August 17, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 32 | August 10, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 31 | August 3, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 30 | July 27, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 29 | July 20, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 28 | July 13, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 27 | July 6, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 26 | June 29, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 25 | June 22, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 24 | June 15, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 23 | June 8, 2009
-
Construction Law Links
-
Volume 7 - Number 22 | June 1, 2009
-
Subscribe
-
Volume 7 - Number 21 | May 25, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 20 | May 18, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 19 | May 11, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 18 | May 4, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 17 | April 27, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 16 | April 20, 2009
-
Volume 6 - Number 32 | August 11, 2008
-
Volume 7 - Number 15 | April 13, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 14 | April 6, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 13 | March 30, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 12 | March 23, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 11 | March 16, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 10 | March 9, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 9 | March 2, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 8 | February 23, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 7 | February 16, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 6 | February 9, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 5 | February 2, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 4 | January 26, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 3 | January 19, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 2 | January 12, 2009
-
Volume 7 - Number 1 | January 5, 2009
-
Forums
-
Volume 3 - Number 8 | February 21, 2005
-
Volume 6 - Number 50 | December 22, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 49 | December 15, 2008
-
Volume 5 - Number 50 | December 17, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 47 | November 26, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 46 | November 19, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 44 | November 5, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 43 | October 29, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 42 | October 22, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 41 | October 15, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 40 | October 8, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 39 | October 1, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 38 | September 24, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 37 | September 17, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 36 | September 10, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 35 | September 3, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 34 | August 27, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 33 | August 20, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 32 | August 13, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 31 | August 6, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 30 | July 30, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 29 | July 23, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 28 | July 9, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 27 | July 2, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 26 | June 25, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 25 | June 18, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 24 | June 11, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 23 | June 4, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 22 | May 28, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 21 | May 21, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 20 | May 14, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 19 | May 7, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 18 | April 30, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 17 | April 23, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 16 | April 16, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 15 | April 9, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 14 | April 2, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 13 | March 26, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 12 | March 19, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 11 | March 12, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 10 | March 5, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 9 | February 26, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 8 | February 19, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 7 | February 12, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 6 | February 5, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 5 | January 29, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 4 | January 22, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 3 | January 15, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 2 | January 8, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 1 | January 1, 2007
-
Volume 4 - Number 50 | December 18, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 49 | December 11, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 48 | December 4, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 47 | November 27, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 46 | November 20, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 45 | November 13, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 44 | November 6, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 43 | October 30, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 42 | October 23, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 41 | October 16, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 40 | October 9, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 39 | October 2, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 38 | September 25, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 37 | September 18, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 36 | September 11, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 35 | September 4, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 34 | August 28, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 33 | August 21, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 32 | August 14, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 31 | August 7, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 30 | July 31, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 29 | July 24, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 28 | July 17, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 27 | July 10, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 26 | July 3, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 25 | June 26, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 24 | June 19, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 23 | June 12, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 22 | June 5, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 21 | May 22, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 20 | May 15, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 19 | May 8, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 18 | May 1, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 17 | April 24, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 16 | April 17, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 15 | April 10, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 14 | April 3, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 13 | March 27, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 12 | March 20, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 11 | March 13, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 10 | March 6, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 9 | February 27, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 8 | February 20, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 7 | February 13, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 6 | February 6, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 5 | January 30, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 4 | January 23, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 3 | January 16, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 2 | January 9, 2006
-
Volume 4 - Number 1 | January 2, 2006
-
Volume 3 - Number 52 | December 26, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 51 | December 19, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 50 | December 12, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 49 | December 5, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 48 | November 28, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 47 | November 21, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 46 | November 14, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 45-Special | November 7, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 45 | November 7, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 44 | October 31, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 43 | October 24, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 42 | October 17, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 41 | October 10, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 40 | October 3, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 39-Special | September 29, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 39 | September 26, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 38 | September 19, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 37 | September 12, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 36 | September 5, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 35 | August 29, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 34 | August 22, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 33 | August 15, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 32 | August 8, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 31 | August 1, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 30 | July 25, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 29 | July 18, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 28 | July 11, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 27 | July 5, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 26 | June 27, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 25 | June 20, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 24 | June 13, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 23 | June 6, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 22 | May 30, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 21 | May 23, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 20 | May 16, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 19 | May 9, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 18 | May 2, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 17 | April 25, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 16 | April 18, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 15 | April 11, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 14 | April 4, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 13 | March 28, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 12 | March 21, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 11 | March 14, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 10 | March 7, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 9 | February 28, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 7 | February 14, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 6 | February 7, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 5 | January 31, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 4 | January 24, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 3 | January 17, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 2 | January 10, 2005
-
Volume 3 - Number 1 | January 3, 2005
-
Volume 2 - Number 52 | December 27, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 51 | December 20, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 50 | December 13, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 49 | December 6, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 48 | November 29, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 47 | November 22, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 46 | November 15, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 45 | November 8, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 44 | November 1, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 43 | October 25, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 42 | October 18, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 41 | October 11, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 40 | October 4, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 39 | September 27, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 38 | September 20, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 37 | September 13, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 36 | September 7, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 35 | August 30, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 34 | August 23, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 33 | August 16, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 32 | August 9, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 31 | August 2, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 30 | July 26, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 29 | July 19, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 28 | July 12, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 26 | June 28, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 27 | July 5, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 25 | June 21, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 24 | June 14, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 23 | June 7, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 22 | May 31, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 21 | May 24, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 20 | May 17, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 19 | May 10, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 18 | May 3, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 17 | April 26, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 16 | April 19, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 15 | April 12, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 14 | April 5, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 13 | March 29, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 12 | March 22, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 11 | March 15, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 10 | March 8, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 9 | March 1, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 8 | Februry 23, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 7 | Februry 16, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 6 | Februry 9, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 5 | Februry 2, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 4 | January 26, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 3 | January 19, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 2 | January 12, 2004
-
Volume 2 - Number 1 | January 5, 2004
-
Volume 1 - Number 5 | December 29, 2003
-
Volume 1 - Number 4 | December 22, 2003
-
Volume 1 - Number 3 | December 15, 2003
-
Volume 1 - Number 2 | December 8, 2003
-
Volume 1 - Number 1 | November 24, 2003
-
Volume 6 - Number 10 | March 10, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 9 | March 3, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 8 | February 25, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 7 | February 18, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 6 | February 11, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 5 | February 4, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 4 | January 28, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 3 | January 21, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 2 | January 14, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 1 | January 7, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 48 | December 8, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 46 | November 24, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 45 | November 17, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 44 | November 10, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 43 | November 3, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 42 | October 27, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 41 | October 20, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 40 | October 13, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 39 | October 6, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 38 | September 29, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 37 | September 22, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 36 | September 15, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 35 | September 8, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 34 | September 2, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 33 | August 18, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 31 | August 4, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 30 | July 28, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 31 | August 11, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 29 | July 21, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 28 | July 14, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 27 | July 7, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 26 | June 30, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 25 | June 23, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 24 | June 16, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 23 | June 9, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 22 | June 2, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 21 | May 26, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 20 | May 19, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 19 | May 12, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 18 | May 5, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 17 | April 28, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 16 | April 21, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 15 | April 14, 2008
-
Volume 6 - Number 14 | April 7, 2008
-
Volume 6 Number 47 | December 1, 2008
-
Volume 5 - Number 45 | November 12, 2007
-
Volume 6 - Number 13 | March 31, 2008
-
Volume 6 Number 12 | March 24, 2008
-
Volume 6 Number 11 | March 17, 2008
-
Press Releases
-
Tips and Techniques
-
THE NEW AACEI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE ON FORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSIS, PART FIVE: CHOOSING THE RIGHT DELAY METHODOLOGY
-
BOOK REVIEW
-
READ THE CONTRACT, ASK QUESTIONS AND GIVE NOTICE
-
RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
-
Bid Protest and Preparation
-
As-Built Schedules. 6 Methods to Prepare and/or Present an As-Built Schedule
-
CUMULATIVE IMPACT AND CARDINAL CHANGES
-
RELEASES MUST MAKE CLEAR THE MONIES IT APPLIES TO
-
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY
-
BOOK REVIEW - Contractor’s Plain-English Legal Guide
-
FORUM CHOICES IN FEDERAL BID PROTESTS
-
THE METHODOLOGY DEBATE AND THE NEW AACEI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR FORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSIS
-
BEST PRACTICES IN AS-BUILT SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT
-
CHANGES IN STANDARD OF CARE COULD MEAN INCREASED FUTURE CLAIMS
-
ETHICS AND THE EXPERT WITNESS – WHEN TO HANG UP THE PHONE
-
CONTEMPORANEOUS PROOF OF DELAY
-
COLLECTING JOB COST FOR CLAIMS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY
-
DO THE SPECIFICATIONS REALLY GOVERN?
-
CHOOSING AN EXPERT
-
BE ALERT WITH UNBALANCED BIDDING
-
ANTICIPATING SITE ACCESS PROBLEMS
-
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER LIABILITY ACTION (AELA) FOR DESIGN ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
-
IMPACT CLAIMS: THE DOCUMENTATION PROCESS
-
INSIGHTS FROM THE DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY MANUAL
-
THE CONSTRUCTION ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX—BUILDING SOLUTIONS, Part 3
-
THE CONSTRUCTION ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX—BUILDING SOLUTIONS, Part 2
-
THE 12 STEP APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING, PART 1
-
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FEDERAL AND STATE ARBITRATION LAW
-
BENEFITS OF CPM SCHEDULING
-
DISCUSSION OF PHYSICAL INJURY ISSUES AS DECIDED IN F & H CONSTRUCTION v. ITT HARTFORD
-
SEVEN WAYS TO REDUCE CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS
-
DELAY CLAIMS
-
DELAY CLAIMS - INTRODUCTION TO TYPES OF DELAY
-
WEATHER IMPACT FOLLOW-UP
-
GETTING MORE FROM CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS ADVISOR
-
CPM SCHEDULE REVIEW AND TIME IMPACT ANALYSIS — STEP-BY-STEP TUTORIAL
-
OUTSIDE THE BOX—SHARED PROJECT CONTROL
-
USING INDUSTRY AVERAGE CURVES TO CALCULATE LABOR INEFFICIENCIES
-
CAUSATION AND CAUSE–EFFECT ANALYSES
-
RESULTANT INJURY AND THE MEASURED MILE
-
TIME FOR A CHANGE IN SCHEDULING PHILOSOPHY
-
SCHEDULING IS KEY
-
MOLD PROBLEMS IN BUILDINGS CONTINUE TO INCREASE AS DO LAWSUITS, INSURANCE COSTS
-
RISK ASSESSMENT AND BEST PRACTICES IN SCHEDULING
-
CLAIMS PREVENTION
-
FIVE STEPS TO PREVENT WARRANTY CONFLICTS AND KEEP FINAL PAYMENT ON TRACK
-
WATCH OUT FOR TIES WITH GOVERNMENT TEAM THAT COULD COST YOU A BIG PROJECT
-
MINIMIZE RISKS WHEN RELYING ON SUBCONTRACTOR QUOTES
-
THE 10-POINT MID-PROJECT SANITY CHECK
-
THE CASE AGAINST OFFSETS WHEN PRICING CHANGES AND DELAY CLAIMS IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS — UPDATE
-
ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COST ENGINEERS ANNUAL MEETING IS A SCHEDULING SUCCESS
-
A MOVE TOWARD BETTER SCHEDULES – CERTIFIED SCHEDULERS!
-
ESTIMATING LOST LABOR PRODUCTIVITY IN CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS - RECOMMENDED PRACTICES
-
SCHEDULING EXPERTS — PART TWO
-
SUBCONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS 101
-
WHY DO CONTRACTORS FAIL?
-
PMI COLLEGE OF SCHEDULING HOLDS FIRST CONFERENCE
-
A SOLUTION TO SCHEDULE MISUSE UNDERWAY
-
AGC RESPONDS TO VOLATILE MATERIAL PRICES WITH PRICE ADJUSTMENT AMENDMENT
-
HOW TO CHOOSE A LAWYER
-
Scheduling Experts - Part 1
-
KEEPING THE PEACE
-
NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE PRIMAVERA ANNUAL USERS CONFERENCE - PART I
-
NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE PRIMAVERA ANNUAL USERS CONFERENCE - PART II
-
TYPES OF DELAYS: PREREQUISITES FOR A DELAY CLAIM — PROPER CAUSES
-
DELAY CLAIMS - PROPER NOTICE
-
USING PRODUCTIVE TIME TO CALCULATE LABOR INEFFICIENCIES
-
TIME FOR A CHANGE IN SCHEDULING PHILOSOPHY
-
AN ENGLISH PERSPECTIVE ON DELAY AND ITS MANAGEMENT
-
CLAIMS PREVENTION: THE OWNER'S ROLE
-
THE DESIGNER’S ROLE IN CLAIMS PREVENTION
-
DELAY OF GAME
-
It’s Not Over Until ... : Guidelines to Prevent Post-Construction Claims
-
THE ART OF CONSTRUCTION MEDIATION
-
RECOVERY SCHEDULES
-
A PREVENTATIVE APPROACH TO IMPACT CLAIMS
-
HOW TO GET PAID FOR CONSTRUCTION CHANGES BY STEVE PINNELL
-
THE DCAA AUDIT MANUAL’S TREATMENT OF DELAY CLAIMS
-
WARNER ON CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS - METHODOLOGIES AND TECHNOLOGIES
-
CONTRACTUAL DEFENSES—WORKING THROUGH “NO DAMAGE FOR DELAY” CLAUSES
-
COPING WITH SITE CONDITION DISCLAIMERS
-
COSTS OVERRUNS: NOW WHAT?
-
LAZY CONCRETE
-
CHANGES IN STARDARD OF CARE—PART TWO
-
Federal Contract Bid Protests Special Report
-
CHANGE IS IN THE AIR: A NEW APPROACH TO PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
-
YOUR BEST CLAIM IS ONE THAT ISN’T
-
CONSTRUCTION PUBLISHER GOES GREEN WITH NEW E-PUBLICATION
-
EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 5-45
-
THE NEW AACEI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE ON FORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSIS, PART 3: METHODS OF FORENSIC DELAY ANALYSIS
-
THE NEW AACE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE ON FORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSIS, PART 2: BASELINE SCHEDULES AND UPDATES
-
HELPFUL TIPS FOR ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION LITIGATION
-
CLAIMS CONSCIOUS OR LOSS MOTIVATED – WHICH ONE ARE YOU?
-
THE PROBLEM OF SCHEDULING AN EVER-CHANGING PROJECT PART 2—THE ANALYSES AND A BLUEPRINT FOR SUCCESSFUL COMPLEX PROJECT SCHEDULE ANALYSIS
-
THE PROBLEM OF SCHEDULING AN EVER-CHANGING PROJECT PART 1—PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND INITIAL SCHEDULE ANALYSES
-
WORKING WITH ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS—THE STATE-OF-THE-ART IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGY
-
SUMMARY OF CPR RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION FOR CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
-
CALCULATE LIEN CLAIMS WITH ACCURACY
-
PROVING DELAY DAMAGE AND IMPACT CLAIMS
-
PROVING IMPACT CLAIMS
-
THE CONSTRUCTION ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX—BUILDING SOLUTIONS, Part 4
-
THE CONSTRUCTION ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX—BUILDING SOLUTIONS, Part 1
-
COST CONTROL FOR THE OWNER
-
THE 12 STEP APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING, PART 2
-
HOW TO HANDLE THE WEATHER
-
SAFETY AND HEALTH REQUIREMENTS MANUAL AVAILABLE
-
A CHECKLIST TO AVOID FALSE CLAIMS
-
THIRD PARTY PRACTICE AND THE COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION DEFECT LITIGATION
-
CONSTRUCTION LEARNING CURVES: FACTUAL OR IMAGINED?
-
THE BASELINE ANALYSIS
-
USING HISTORIC WEATHER INFORMATION TO CREATE BETTER CPM SCHEDULES AND SUPPORT DELAY CLAIMS
-
INTERNET RESOURCES ON MOLD, CLAIMS IDENTIFICATION AND LOST LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
-
INTERVIEW OF NEW EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBER DR. LEWIS — FOCUS ON CLAIMS AVOIDANCE
-
THE SOCIETY OF CONSTRUCTION ARBITRATORS — 100-DAY ARBITRATION PROCEDURE
-
CLAIMS AVOIDANCE BEFORE SIGNING THE CONTRACT
-
THREE STEPS TO MINIMIZE LOSSES DUE TO STEEL CRISIS
-
PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, PROGRESS TRACKING AND CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS WITH EXCEL
-
EXCEL, THE PREFERRED TOOL FOR PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, PROGRESS TRACKING AND CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS
-
NON-PARTY ISSUES
-
PRIMAVERA P3e/c PRELIMINARY NOTES
-
News
-
Digest
-
Recent Court Opinions
-
INSURER PAYS RELOCATION COSTS DURING REPAIR WORK
-
CONTRACTOR WINS RIGHT TO HAVE CASE RE-HEARD ON MERITS
-
SUB-SUB WINS NEGLIGENCE CLAIM AGAINST PRIME, IS AWARDED DAMAGES BASED ON TOTAL COST METHOD; BUT NO PASS THROUGH CLAIM PERMITTED
-
DRUG TESTING REQUIREMENT VARIES WITH CONTRACTS
-
MORTENSON LOSES CONTRACT INTERPRETATION RULING
-
VIRGIN ISLANDS ENJOINED FROM FURTHER ACTION ON CONTRACT BECAUSE OF POLITICAL INFLUENCE AND CORRUPTION
-
SPLICED RAILS CANNOT BE SUBSTITUTED FOR UNSPLICED RAILS
-
COURT ALLOWS DMJM TO BE TRIED FOR FALSE CLAIMS
-
DAMAGED CRANE COVERED BY GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY, NOT BUILDER’S RISK
-
ARKANSAS LIEN LAW TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER CONTRACT’S CHOICE OF VENUE
-
NON-PARTY TO ARBITRATION ENTITLED TO RELY ON AWARD
-
INADVERTENTLY DISCOVERED DOCUMENTS ARE PROTECTED, THIS TIME AROUND
-
CONTRACT MODIFICATION RELEASES DEFEAT PERINI’S $8.4 MILLION DELAY CLAIM; BOARD TOSSES CPM ANALYSIS IN REDUCING LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
-
CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO UNBALANCED UNIT PRICES
-
TRIAL COURT CORRECTLY DENIES ATTORNEY FEES IN ARBITRATION AWARD
-
Churchill and Confucius Assist Federal Court of Claims in Bid Protest Ruling
-
Bid in Fax Machine Memory Does Not Meet Deadline
-
Judge Throws Out California School District’s Attempt to Rip Off Contractor on Bid Error
-
Connecticut Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Finding That Surety Had Not Proven Indemnification and Had Breached Its Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
-
City Must Reimburse Surety for Funds Released to Contractor
-
Court Allows Trial to Proceed to Determine Delay Damages
-
TOTAL COST METHOD UNDER MILLER ACT DOES NOT REQUIRE SHOWING OF CAUSATION
-
AIA CONTRACT DOCUMENTS LIMITED OWNER’S DAMAGES FOR DEFAULT
-
EXCAVATOR COULD NOT RELY ON PRIME CONTRACTOR FOR SAFE DIGGING COMPLIANCE
-
CLAIM CONSULTANT ENTITLED TO FOUR TIMES ORIGINAL ESTIMATED FEE
-
DEFAULT REVERSED BECAUSE CONTRACTING OFFICER MISUNDERSTOOD COMPLETION DEADLINE
-
ARBITRATION PANEL ISSUES FINAL AWARD ON REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER DISPUTE IN LAS VEGAS
-
CLOSE-OUT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED BEFORE RELEASE OF RETAINAGE
-
CLAIM PREPARATION COSTS RECOVERED IN TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE
-
UNIT-PRICE SUBCONTRACT DID NOT GUARANTEE MINIMUM QUANTITIES
-
MECHANIC’S LIEN STATUTES ARE NOW PLATFORM FOR LITIGATING DISPUTED WORK
-
EXPERT WITNESS NOT EXCLUDED BASED ON PROJECT INVOLVEMENT
-
ARBITRATOR DID NOT VIOLATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST RULE
-
CHALLENGE TO UNBALANCED BID MUST INCLUDE CHALLENGE TO QUANTITY ESTIMATES
-
COLORADO HIGH COURT ALLOWS RECOVERY OF IMPAIRED BONDING CAPACITY DAMAGES
-
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION DID NOT SATISFY CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT
-
WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT SIGNED CONTRACT LEADS TO INDEMNITY PROBLEMS
-
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR BURIED GRUBBING DEBRIS
-
COST OF IDLED UNMANNED EQUIPMENT WAS NOT LIENABLE
-
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS NOT NEGATED BY SPECIFIED PRODUCT “OR EQUAL”
-
SUPPLIER TO A SUPPLIER WAS TOO REMOTE FOR LIEN PROTECTION
-
INVESTOR-OWNED UTILITY SUBJECT TO 1 WORKS PAYMENT BOND STATUTE
-
SUB BECAME BOUND BY TERMS MISSING FROM E-MAILED PURCHASE ORDER
-
TEMPORARY WORK PLATFORM PRICED AS “MATERIAL,” NOT “EQUIPMENT”
-
NEW HOME WARRANTY ARBITRATION CLAUSE RULED UNCONSCIONABLE
-
FAILURE TO ADJUST GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE MAY HAVE BEEN A BREACH
-
ENGINEER’S LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DID NOT VIOLATE PUBLIC POLICY
-
BIDDER FAILED TO WITHDRAW BID DESPITE KNOWLEDGE OF OMISSIONS IN SUBCONTRACTOR?S PRICE QUOTATION
-
CONTRACTOR COULD NOT PROVE ENTITLEMENT TO PAYMENT
-
APPEAL BOND COVERED PERFORMANCE SURETY ONLY
-
FINAL PAYMENT AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK WAS NOT A “PROGRESS PAYMENT”
-
SUB'S OWN JOB COST RECORDS DEFEAT CLAIM FOR EXTRA WORK
-
ELIGIBILITY STATUS SHOULD HAVE BEEN REFERRED TO SBA
-
SUBCONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT WHEN SURETY FAILS TO SUBMIT TIMELY ANSWER TO PAYMENT BOND CLAIM
-
HOMEOWNERS WIN COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST CONTRACTOR FOR FAILURE TO PERFORM IN WORKMANLIKE MANNER
-
CONTRACTOR CAN SUE CITY FOR GIVING PREFERENCE TO MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESSES
-
COURT ALLOWS INSURANCE COMPANY TO BE SUED
-
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR LOSES OVER 50 APPEALS BEFORE THE ASBCA
-
APPELLATE COURT REJECTS RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF STATUTE VOIDING CHOICE OF LAW PROVISIONS IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
-
REJECTION OF UNBALANCED BID UPHELD
-
INSURER PAYS BLACK & VEATCH $38 MILLION IN DELAY MITIGATION COSTS RESULTING FROM LOST CARGO
-
DEFAULT TERMINATION UPHELD ON EPA DELAY
-
SUBCONTRACTOR LIABLE FOR ITS EMPLOYEE’S INJURIES – PRIME AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OFF THE HOOK
-
SCAFFOLDING DEATH TRIGGERS MULTIPLE OSHA VIOLATIONS – APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS
-
INSURANCE COMPANY DOESN’T HAVE TO COVER COMPANIES LIES
-
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WIN CONTRACTOR 90-DAY FILE EXTENSION APPEAL
-
HOMEOWNERS SUE DEVELOPER – (BANKRUPT) INSURANCE COMPANY FORCED TO PAY
-
AGBCA JUDGE DENIES TYPE 1 DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS CLAIMS; SUGGESTS CONTRACTOR RESUBMIT THE CLAIM
-
CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS CAN SAVE CONTRACTORS MONEY
-
CALIFORNIA COURT HOLDS THAT A CONSPICUOUS AND UNDERSTANDABLE DISCLAIMER OF AN IMPLIED WARRANTY OF QUALITY IS ENFORCEABLE
-
STATUTE OF LIMITATION DID NOT BAR DEFECTS CLAIM
-
WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS WAS INOPERABLE
-
REMEDIATION EXPENSE FOR DEFECTIVE DESIGN NOT COVERED UNDER BUILDER'S RISK
-
CONTRACTOR'S COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COVERED DEFECTIVE WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS
-
PENDING SEPARATE CLAIMS UNDER THE CONTRACT DO NOT PRECLUDE “PREVAILING PARTY” STATUS
-
SUBCONTRACTOR WAS NOT PREVAILING PARTY DESPITE NET RECOVERY
-
JOINT CHECK AGREEMENT COMPROMISED BY EXCLUSIVE PAYMENT BOND REMEDY
-
LOW BIDS REJECTED DUE TO INVOLVEMENT OF GOVERNMENT RETIREE
-
COST-PLUS CONTRACTOR ACCOUNTED PROPERLY FOR JOB COSTS
-
ELECTRONIC BID FOILED BY CORRUPT FILE ATTACHMENT
-
FOREIGN COMPANY DEEMED RESPONSIBLE DESPITE PRIOR BID RIGGING
-
TERRITORIAL MANAGER HAD APPARENT AUTHORITY TO WARRANT MATERIALS
-
ARIZONA HIGH COURT ENFORCES LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CLAUSE
-
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CLAUSE STRUCK FROM SUBCONTRACT FORM
-
SUBCONTRACTOR WAS UNLICENSED BECAUSE ELECTRICIAN NEVER PERSONALLY SUPERVISED WORK
-
PROJECT OWNER UNABLE TO ENFORCE ARBITRATION AWARD DUE TO CORPORATE CONFUSION
-
FAILURE TO PROVIDE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE IS CONCURRENT DELAY TO FLAWED PLANS
-
CONTRACTOR SANCTIONED FOR BAD FAITH ASSERTION OF SUBCONTRACT SET-OFFS
-
CHALLENGE OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WAS A “CLAIM” UNDER CONTRACT DISPUTES ACT
-
UNPAID SUBCONTRACTOR PURSUES OWNER FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT
-
CITY WAIVES IMMUNITY
-
CONDO ASSOCIATION ALLOWED TO AMEND BYLAWS TO DELETE ARBITRATION CLAUSE THEN SUE BUILDER
-
CONTRACT LANGUAGE UPHELD TO PREVENT CONTRACTOR FROM OBTAINING MECHANIC’S LIEN
-
HIGHWAY AUTHORITY NOT ELIGIBLE FOR ELEVENTH AMENDMENT IMMUNITY AS AN ARM OF THE STATE
-
COURT AWARDS ATTORNEY FEES TO PREVAILING PARTY
-
UNLICENSED CONTRACTOR ALLOWED TO FILE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT
-
FEDERAL CLAIMS COURT UPHOLDS TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE PAYMENT BOND
-
OWNER RELEASED CONTRACTOR AND LOST RIGHTS AGAINST BOND
-
CONTRACTOR DID NOT RESCIND UNIT-PRICE CONTRACT
-
UNLICENSED CONTRACTOR ALLOWED TO SUE FOR PAYMENT
-
CONTRACT DRAWINGS MUST BE HARMONIZED
-
ARMY EMPLOYEE LACKED AUTHORITY TO MODIFY GSA CONTRACT
-
BIDDER USED WRONG E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL
-
GEORGIA HIGH COURT ADDRESSES DAMAGES FOR DEFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION
-
NEW YORK HIGH COURT ENFORCES INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE
-
PREVAILING PARTY DENIED ATTORNEYS FEES (UNDER EAJA) BECAUSE OPPOSING PARTY'S POSITION WAS SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED
-
LIEN ON CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY DID NOT NEED TO NAME INDIVIDUAL OWNERS
-
GOVERNMENT CLAIM POSITION “SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED” DESPITE STONEWALL TACTICS TACTICS
-
CONTRACTOR CLAIMS FOR EXTRA WORK AND HIGHER UNIT PRICE DENIED
-
DIRECTIVE EXCEEDED SCOPE OF INDEFINITE QUANTITY TASK ORDER
-
CONTRACT AWARD CANNOT BE CHALLENGED BY PETITION
-
UNION WAGE SUBSIDIES PERMISSIBLE BUT COERCION IS NOT
-
LOW BIDDER NOT ENTITLED TO SUBSTITUTE BID SECURITY ASSETS
-
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION REQUIRED COMPLIANT TEST REPORT
-
NON-COMPETITIVE AWARD OF “EMERGENCY” ROAD CONTRACT NOT JUSTIFIED BY ALLEGED SAFETY CONCERNS
-
EXTENDED JOB SITE COSTS RECOVERED DESPITE DISCLAIMER
-
AGENCY BUNDLING OF MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ALLOWED
-
FLAWED SCHEDULE ANALYSIS NEGATES DEFAULT TERMINATION RULING
-
OWNER LIABILITY FOR NONDISCLOSURE DOES NOT REQUIRE INTENTIONAL CONCEALMENT
-
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AUTHORIZATION VIOLATED PROCUREMENT STATUTES
-
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FOR TRIBAL CASINO SUBJECT TO STATE TAX
-
CONTRACTOR LIABLE FOR RESEQUENCING WORK DESPITE SUBCONTRACT DISCLAIMER
-
OMITTED FEDERAL CLAUSE CANNOT BE READ INTO CONTRACT
-
ENGINEER’S LIMITATION OF LIABILITY VOIDED BY GEORGIA HIGH COURT
-
EXTREME NATURE OF MATERIAL WAS DIFFERING SITE CONDITION
-
SUPPLIER NOT ALLOWED TO CHALLENGE RESTRICTIVE SPECIFICATION
-
PAYMENT BOND CANNOT APPLY TO PRE-CONTRACT COSTS
-
DISCLAIMER OF CONSEQUENCES RULED UNENFORCEABLE
-
AIA PROGRESS PAYMENT CLAUSE DID NOT NEGATE STATE TRUST STATUTE
-
FLOW-DOWN CLAUSE IN AIA ARCHITECT-CONSULTANT AGREEMENT RULED AMBIGUOUS
-
LIEN RIGHTS LOST BECAUSE CONTRACTOR ABANDONED PROJECT
-
GAO ADDRESSES ALLOCATION OF BID PROTEST COSTS
-
COLORADO RECOGNIZES NO-DAMAGE-FOR-DELAY CLAUSES AND EXCEPTION
-
TEXAS HIGH COURT FINDS WAIVER OF ARBITRATION RIGHTS
-
JILTED SUB RECOVERS PREPARATION COSTS BUT NOT ANTICIPATED PROFIT
-
CONTRACTOR COULD NOT RECOVER FROM ENGINEER FOR INTERFERENCE
-
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO CONSOLIDATE ALL KNOWN CLAIMS
-
PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION DID NOT PROMISE COMMERCIAL AVAILABILITY
-
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CLAUSE ENFORCED IN ENGINEERING AGREEMENT
-
ALLOCATION OF LOAN DRAW RESULTS IN CHARGE OF FELONY THEFT BY CONTRACTOR
-
CONTRACTUAL DEFINITION OF WORK INCONSISTENT WITH PRIOR DESIGN
-
SPECIFICATIONS CLARIFIED UNDEFINED TERM
-
SCHEDULING AND COORDINATION CONCERNS JUSTIFIED NEGOTIATED PROCUREMENT
-
PRE-BID SITE INVESTIGATION CLAUSE ENFORCED AGAINST CONTRACTOR
-
DISCLAIMER OF ACCELERATION AND LOST PRODUCTIVITY DAMAGES RULED UNENFORCEABLE
-
COURT REFUSES TO ALLOW JURY TO CONSIDER EXCEPTION TO DELAY DISCLAIMER
-
PRIME MISHANDLES SUBCONTRACTOR DEFAULT AND LOSES RIGHTS AGAINST PERFORMANCE BOND
-
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT INTERPRETS HOME REPAIR STATUTE
-
SUBCONTRACTOR’S NEGLIGENT MISUSE OF LICENSE DID NOT HARM PROJECT OWNER
-
LOST EFFICIENCY CALCULATED AGAINST PLANNED RATE OF PRODUCTION
-
LIEN FILING DID NOT WAIVE CONTRACTOR?S ARBITRATION RIGHTS
-
SUB'S FINANCE COMPANY COULD SUE PRIME OVER PROGRESS PAYMENTS
-
PRIME CONTRACTOR MUST CERTIFY SPONSORED SUBCONTRACTOR CLAIM
-
“CONSTRUCTION CHANGES” DISTINGUISHED FROM “CLAIMS” UNDER THE AIA CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
-
INCREASED COSTS CAUSED BY PUBLIC PROJECT OWNER’S FAILURE TO INFORM
-
SUBCONTRACTOR RECEIVED ADEQUATE NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DEFECTIVE WORK
-
PROFIT EXCLUDED FROM DEDUCTIVE CREDIT WHEN CONTRACTOR IS IN LOSS POSITION
-
EXCLUSION ORDER SUSPENDS CONTRACTOR’S WORK WITHOUT COMPENSATION
-
LOW BIDDER NONRESPONSIBLE DESPITE STATE CERTIFICATE
-
INSERTION OF LOCAL HIRING PREFERENCE RESULTS IN LOSS OF FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING
-
CONTRACTOR’S BREACH PRECEDED OWNER’S NONPAYMENT
-
BUNDLING OF CONTRACTS ALLOWED DESPITE IMPACT ON SMALL BUSINESS
-
AIA ARBITRATION CLAUSE DID NOT UNDULY FAVOR ARCHITECTS
-
CLAIM NOTICE STRICTLY ENFORCED AGAINST CONTRACTOR
-
NO PUBLIC CONTRACT FORMED DESPITE TRANSMITTAL OF MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS
-
COURT CALLED UPON TO DETERMINE DATES OF PERFORMANCE PERIOD
-
CORRESPONDENCE DID NOT SATISFY CLAIM NOTICE REQUIREMENT
-
CONTRACTOR REASONABLY RELIED ON DEFECTIVE SPECS DURING BID PREPARATION
-
UNDISBURSED CONTRACT BALANCE COVERED OWNER’S COSTS
-
FORMAL DECLARATION OF DEFAULT NOT REQUIRED TO TRIGGER PERFORMANCE BOND OBLIGATION
-
PAST PERFORMANCE STANDARDS DID NOT INCLUDE STATED DOLLAR THRESHOLDS
-
SUBCONTRACTOR BOUND BY REFERENCED TERMS
-
SUPPLIER RENEGED ON COMMITMENT BUT SUBCONTRACTOR FAILED TO PROVE LOST PROFIT
-
SURETY NOT REQUIRED TO ARBITRATE DESPITE CLAUSE IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
-
CONTRACTOR RECOVERS TWELVE PERCENT OF $734K CONSULTANT AND ATTORNEY BILL AS COST OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION RELATED TO CLAIMS RESOLUTION
-
SUBCONTRACTOR PROTECTED AGAINST GOVERNMENT SET-OFF
-
PROJECT OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR DIRECTING DEFECTIVE WORK
-
ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING CLAUSE SURVIVED VOID CONTRACT
-
SUBCONTRACTOR BREACHED WARRANTY, PRINCIPAL HELD PERSONALLY LIABLE
-
CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO ALL APPROPRIATE TIME EXTENSIONS
-
HOMEOWNERS RECOVER FOR “STIGMA” CAUSED BY DEFECTIVE WORK
-
SUBCONTRACTOR SETTLES WITH SURETY, THEN SUES FOR BAD FAITH
-
COURT ADDRESSES PRIME’S OBLIGATION TO SPONSOR SUBCONTRACTOR CLAIMS
-
DESIGN SERVICES LIENABLE BECAUSE THEY “LAID GROUNDWORK” FOR PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS
-
ATTORNEY FEE PROVISION PREVAILED OVER ARBITRATION AWARD
-
ARBITRATOR MUST RULE FIRST ON LEGALITY OF CONTRACT
-
CONTRACTOR’S SCHEDULE DID NOT ALTER CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE
-
COURT ADDRESSES NO-DAMAGE-FOR-DELAY CLAUSE AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PASS-THROUGH
-
AGENCY NOT ALLOWED TO IGNORE PREQUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT
-
DELETION RULED TERMINATION INSTEAD OF DEDUCTIVE CHANGE
-
BOND PROTECTION LOST DUE TO LACK OF PROPER NOTICE
-
“BEST VALUE” EVALUATION NOT BASED ON NUMERICAL COUNT
-
CONTRACTOR RECOVERS FOR FULL QUANTITY OF UNIT-PRICE ITEMS
-
NO SEPARATE ACTION REQUIRED AGAINST BOND SUBSTITUTED FOR A MECHANIC’S LIEN
-
FAILURE TO ESTABLISH AGENCY RELATIONSHIP BARS CLAIMS AGAINST MANUFACTURER
-
CONTRACTOR RECOVERY FOR IMPAIRED BONDING CAPACITY DENIED
-
CONTRACTOR’S PRE-BID INVESTIGATION RULED ADEQUATE
-
WRONGFULLY TERMINATED CONTRACTOR LIMITED TO NET PROFIT ON UNPERFORMED WORK
-
CONTRACTOR USES “MEASURED MILE” APPROACH TO QUANTIFY SITE CONDITION CLAIM
-
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CLAUSE ENFORCED IN ENGINEERING AGREEMENT
-
PREVAILING WAGE VIOLATIONS DID NOT RESULT IN “FALSE CLAIMS”
-
SPECIFICATION FOR ENCLOSURE DID NOT IMPLY SAME MATERIAL FOR EQUIPMENT
-
CONTRACTOR FAILED TO DOCUMENT INCREASED COSTS CAUSED BY QUANTITY UNDER-RUN
-
SUBCONTRACT “PAY-WHEN-PAID” CLAUSE RULED AMBIGUOUS
-
MULTIPLE NON-RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATIONS WERE NOT DEBARMENT
-
SUB BOUND BY PRIME CONTRACTOR’S CLAIM REMEDIES
-
SITE CONDITION DISCLAIMER NOT ENFORCED
-
ADVERSE PAST PERFORMANCE RATING SINKS LOW COST PROPOSAL
-
WORKERS’ COMP INSURER NOT ENTITLED TO MAKE CLAIM AGAINST CONTRACTOR’S SURETY BOND
-
EXPERT LEGAL TESTIMONY EXLCUDED FROM TRIAL
-
GENERAL CONDITIONS DID NOT REQUIRE SEPARATE SIGNATURE OR ACKNOWLEDGMENT
-
UNRESOLVED “MINOR DETAILS” PREVENTED CREATION OF BINDING SUBCONTRACT
-
OWNER’S IMPLIED WARRANTY OF DESIGN OVERRIDDEN BY CHANGE ORDER CLAUSE
-
RESPONSIBILITY FOR LATE COMPLETION APPORTIONED BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR
-
JOB SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT GOVERNED CONFLICTING GENERAL SPECIFICATION
-
CONTRACTOR RELIEVED FROM QUANTITY BLUNDER
-
ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE PROCEEDS DID NOT ALTER CONTRACTOR’S STATUS
-
FEDERAL CIRCUIT ADDRESSES TERMINATION SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL DEADLINE
-
CONTRACTOR RECOVERS FOR WRONGFUL TERMINATION, BUT IS DENIED LOST PROFIT
-
CONTRACTOR ACCELERATED AND ALTERED SEQUENCE OF SUB’S WORK
-
PROJECT WAS NOT “PUBLIC WORK,” SO NO PAYMENT BOND REQUIRED
-
CONTRACTOR MUST RETURN MISTAKEN DOUBLE PAYMENT
-
PRIME DENIED COST OF COMPLETION FROM DEFAULTED SUB
-
NOTICE OF CLAIM NOT REQUIRED IF PROJECT OWNER BREACHED CONTRACT
-
ANOTHER SITE CONDITION CLAIM DENIED DUE TO CONTRACTOR INATTENTION
-
BUILDER FAILS TO SEGREGATE COST OVERRUNS FROM EXTRA WORK
-
LOW BID IMPROPERLY REJECTED DUE TO PROPOSED SCHEDULE
-
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT REQUIRED TO HAVE CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE
-
FAILURE TO FOLLOW CLAIM PROCEDURES BARS SUBCONTRACTOR’S RECOVERY OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
-
ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT WAS AN IMPROVEMENT TO REAL PROPERTY
-
CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTORS PROTECTED BY WAIVER CLAUSE IN AIA CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
-
PROJECT OWNER LIABLE TO CONTRACTOR FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE BUILDER’S RISK COVERAGE
-
WASHINGTON HIGH COURT EXPOSES CONTRACTORS TO POST-ACCEPTANCE TORT LIABILITY
-
WAIVER AND RELEASE APPLIED TO UNAPPROVED CHANGE ORDER REQUESTS
-
CONTRACTOR CONFUSED REGARDING IDENTITY OF PROJECT OWNER
-
OWNER’S CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS MAY WAIVE CONTRACTUAL CLAIM INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
-
SUBCONTRACT PRICE NOT REDUCED DUE TO LACK OF DEDUCTIVE CHANGE ORDER
-
CONTRACTOR PENALIZED $50 MILLION FOR FRAUDULENT CLAIM
-
CONTRACTORS’ MIX DESIGNS WERE PROTECTED TRADE SECRETS
-
"PAY-IF-PAID" CLAUSE ENFORCED IN NEW YORK WHEN FLORIDA LAW APPLIED
-
CONTRACTOR FAILED TO PROVE ADDITIONAL FIELD OVERHEAD
-
FAST-TRACK PROJECT SUBJECT TO RE-PRICING
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
A CASHED CHECK SATISFIES AN ACCORD, RULES A STATE HIGH COURT
-
INVOLUNTARY BANKRUPTCY FILING DOES NOT TRIGGER CLOCK FOR PWA CLAIMS
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
COMPANY RUNS AFOUL OF UNION FOR NON-UNION WORKERS
-
CONTRACT BREACH AND PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL ARE LEGITIMATE CLAIMS AGAINST SUB THAT WITHDREW CONTRACT BID
-
STATUTE VIOLATIONS DON’T INVALIDATE FULLY PERFORMED CONTRACTS OR RIGHT TO PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION
-
ADR PROVISION CANNOT SURVIVE PREMATURE CONTRACT TERMINATION
-
GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT WITH SUBCONTRACTOR MAY CREATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUBCONTRACTOR DELAYS
-
CONTRACTOR WRONGLY INTERPRETS INDEMNITY CLAUSE
-
EMPLOYEE WHOSE ACTIONS CAUSED OWN INJURY GETS NO COURT SYMPATHY
-
COURT ISSUES WIN-LOSE VERDICT FOR BOTH PARTIES IN CONCRETE PROJECT
-
OPERATOR GETS STUCK WITH OIL SPILL CLEAN-UP COSTS
-
CONTRACT PROVISIONS CAN BE RETROACTIVE, COURT RULES
-
EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE WON’T PROVE BID RESPONSIVENESS
-
COURT, STATE LEGISLATURE ALTER TIME LIMIT STATUTES SO THEY CAN COEXIST
-
APPEALS COURT REVERSES JUDGMENT FOR DELIVERY DRIVERS
-
CONTRACTOR CAN’T AVOID COURT ACTION FOR FURNISHING WRONG INFORMATION TO SUB
-
SURETY WINS INDEMNITY FIGHT AGAINST CONTRACTOR
-
STATE HIGH COURT OVERTURNS LOWER COURT’S VERDICT FOR NEW TRIAL
-
SUB’S INJURY TRIGGERS ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE FOR OWNER AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR
-
CONTRACTOR SKIPS OUT ON CONTRACT, BLAMES OTHERS FOR CONTRACT CANCELLATION
-
VERBAL CONTRACT AND UNION INVOLVEMENT MUDDY LEGALITIES IN GRAVEL HAULING PROJECT
-
CALIF. SUPREME COURT OFFERS POSSIBLE RISK MANAGEMENT “CATCH 22” SOLUTION
-
GOVERNMENT MUST ACCEPT PUBLIC BIDS AT FACE VALUE
-
CONTRACT DISCREPANCY LEADS TO COURT, NOT MEDIATION
-
UNION AND CONTRACTOR TUSSLE OVER JURISDICTION FOR LABOR DISPUTE
-
DETERMINATION OF BUSINESS RESPONSIBILITY COMES AFTER AN AWARD IN CASCADE PROCUREMENT BIDDING
-
COMPANY LOSES GSA CONTRACT BID OVER “BEST VALUE” DOCTRINE
-
COURT USES “EXTRINSIC” EVIDENCE TO RENDER DECISION
-
IMPLIED WARRANTY IS INCLUDED AS PART OF HOME SALE
-
CONTRACT WAIVER FORCES INSURANCE COMPANY TO PAY THE TAB
-
DEADLINES FOR LEGAL ACTIONS CONTINUE TO TRIP UP CONTRACTORS
-
CONTRACTOR’S COUNTERCLAIMS CUTS JUDGMENT AND INTEREST PENALTIES IN HALF
-
NO DOUBLE-DIPPING ALLOWED FOR SUBCONTRACTOR
-
ARMY CORPS CAN’T PASS THE BUCK IN DESIGN CONTRACT DISPUTE
-
CONTRACTOR NOT LIABLE FOR INJURED WORKER’S FALL
-
DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT PROCUREMENT ILLEGAL FOR STATE PROJECTS
-
FAILURE TO KEEP RECORDS OR JUSTIFY COSTS PROMPTS COURT TO LOWER MONETARY AWARD
-
JUDGE DEALS DOUBLE BLOW TO PLAINTIFF CONTRACTOR
-
STATE HIGH COURT WAIVES IRREGULAR PRACTICE BY TRANSPORTATION DEPT.
-
COURT REBUFFS SUB’S INJURY CASE
-
CITY’S BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM BACKFIRES
-
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CAN PREEMPT COUNTY’S FIRE CODES
-
INDEMNITY CLAUSE NO GUARANTEE FOR DEFECT RECOVERY
-
VERBAL CONTRACT ILLEGAL, BUT COURT ACCEPTS CASE ON LIMITED TERMS
-
O’BRIEN-GERE PRESERVES QUANTUM MERUIT RECOVERY IN FRUCON/FLUOR-DANIEL CONTRACT ABANDONMENT APPEAL
-
TRIAL COURT AGREES DAMAGE CAUSED BY “ACT OF GOD”
-
INSURER HAS DUTY TO DEFEND IN DEFECTIVE PARTS
-
APPEALS COURT VACATES LOWER COURT DECISION, DISQUALIES ARBITRATOR
-
TURNER EXCUSED IN COLORADO BRIDGE MISHAP
-
SPECIAL APPEALS COURT TURNS TABLE ON SURETY COMPANY
-
CONCRETE SUPPLIER LIABLE FOR GC’s LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
-
GENERAL CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO PAY LOST PROFITS TO TERMINATED SUPPLIER
-
WHAT-IF SCENARIO NOT ENOUGH TO WIN MALPRACTICE SUIT
-
NY APPEALS COURT AFFIRMS LATE FILING DISMISSAL
-
CONTRACTOR CAN’T FORCE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION INTO ARBITRATION
-
FOURTH CIRCUIT ENFORCES ARBITRATION IN SKANSKA SUIT
-
CITY’S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM VIOLATES STATE CONSTITUTION’S ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROVISION
-
SEVENTH CIRCUIT CLARIFIES JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE AND NOTIFIES ALL ACTIVE JUDGES
-
BOND CLAIM APPEAL DEFERED PENDING RESPONSE FROM FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
-
GC LIABLE FOR VERBAL CHANGE ORDER AND SITE CONDITIONS INTERPRETATION
-
STO EIFS SYSTEM DISCOVERY SANCTIONS REVERSED
-
COURT AFFIRMS ELECTRICIAN’S LIEN ON CONDO AS VALID, UPHOLDS TOTAL COST RECOVERY
-
CITY CAN’T GET ATTORNEYS’ FEES AFTER ISSUING LATE SETTLEMENT OFFER
-
COURT AWARDS ATTORNEYS' FEES ON BID PROTEST
-
UPDATE ON WATTS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ZURICH: REHEARING DENIED
-
BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS CLARIFIES WEATHER DELAY ISSUES
-
CONTRACTOR FAILS EICHLEAY AND TOTAL COST MATH TESTS
-
TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT ON HYDROELECTRIC PLANT UPHELD
-
CONTRACTOR'S INSURANCE CLAIM BARRED DUE TO FAULTY WORKMANSHIP
-
SUBCONTRACTOR REMAINS LIABLE EVEN AFTER DISSOLUTION
-
CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS AGAINST BEAZER NOT BARRED BY STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
-
APPELLATE COURT PARTIALLY AFFIRMS, PARTIALLY REVERSES LIEN RELEASE AND JOINT CHECK AGREEMENT
-
JUDGE ALLOWS ARBITRATOR TO DECIDE TIMELINESS OF ARBITRATION DEMAND
-
OFFICERS, AGENTS MAY BE PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR HOME IMPROVEMENT VIOLATIONS
-
APPELLATE COURT RULES DISTRIBUTOR QUOTE ON SUB-BID NOT BINDING
-
ARBITRATION AWARD UPHELD
-
FAULTY WORKMANSHIP EXCLUSION IN CGL POLICY PREVAILS
-
NOTICE FAILURE DEFEATS SUBCONTRACTOR'S DELAY CLAIM
-
DEFECTIVE DRAWINGS DO NOT JUSTIFY LACK OF COORDINATION
-
GC’S SUIT ON BEHALF OF SUB NOT BARRED BY STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
-
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER NOT ENTITLED TO INDEMNIFICATION
-
REQUIREMENTS FOR MECHANICS’ LIENS MUST BE STRICTLY COMPLIED WITH
-
CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS MUST SUBMIT TO AGENCY’S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS PRIOR TO SEEKING COURT RELIEF
-
APPELLATE COURT UPHOLDS $7 MILLION REDUCTION IN LIEN FILED BY SUBCONTRACTOR
-
COURT REJECTS SUB’S CLAIM THAT GC SOLD BID INFO
-
GENERAL CONTRACTOR MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR INJURY TO LOWER TIER SUB’S EMPLOYEE
-
GENERAL CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO INTRODUCE INDUSTRY CUSTOM PRACTICE TO DEFEND NEGLIGENCE ACTION
-
CITY REQUIRED TO REVOKE BUILDING PERMIT FOR COMPLETED STRUCTURE
-
BIFURCATED CLAIM UNDERMINES SUBCONTRACTOR’S ATTEMPT TO COLLECT FOR UNPAID WORK
-
LOCAL WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS MAY EXCEED FEDERAL AND STATE’S
-
CONTRACTOR LOSES TWO MORE CONSTRUCTIVE CHANGES
-
CONTRACTOR’S INTERPRETATION OF ABSENT STEEL DETAIL IS REASONABLE
-
9/11 SUSPENSION OF WORK REQUIRES TRIAL TO DETERMINE IF COMPENSABLE
-
CONTRACTOR NOT REQUIRED TO WITHDRAW BID FOR SUBCONTRACTOR BID MISTAKE
-
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHARE CONSEQUENCES OF MISTAKE IN BID DOCUMENT
-
CONTRACTOR RELEASED RIGHTS TO PRE-CHANGE ORDER COSTS
-
CONDO OWNERS NOT REQUIRED TO ARBITRATE DISPUTE
-
SUBCONTRACTOR ALLOWED TO SUE OWNER DIRECTLY DUE TO BANKRUPT GENERAL CONTRACTOR
-
‘YOUR WORK’ EXCLUSION CLAUSE DEFINED IN AN INSURANCE CLAIM AS WORK PERFORMED MOSTLY BY THE INSURED
-
INDEMNITY AGREEMENT BOUND BY RECIPROCITY RULE
-
SUBCONTRACTOR RECOVERS FULL ATTORNEYS’ FEES ON DEFECTS CASE
-
ARBITRABILITY OF FALSE CLAIMS ACT CHARGES UPHELD
-
JUDGE TOSSES SUIT THAT $168 MILLION CONTRACT WAS BID LOW IN ORDER TO PURSUE CHANGE ORDERS
-
APPEALS COURT REMANDS CASE TO DETERMINE IF PROJECT IS GOVERNED BY MILLER ACT
-
CONTRACTOR TERMINATED FOR DEFAULT BECAUSE OF WORKPLACE SAFETY CONCERNS
-
CPM ANALYSIS REQUIRED TO PROVE SHOP DRAWING APPROVAL DELAYS; MANUAL UPDATE MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO PRIMAVERA
-
SUBCONTRACTOR CLEARED TO FILE SEPARATE FRAUD SUIT AGAINST GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR WITHHOLDING DELAY DAMAGE PAYMENTS
-
SOLID CONTRACT HELPS ROOFING SUPPLIER DEFEAT BREACH-OF-CONTRACT CLAIMS
-
FAILURE TO VISIT SITE DEFEATS DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS CLAIM; DELAY CLAIM STILL TRIABLE
-
CONTRACTOR UNABLE TO OVERCOME ARBITRATION PROCEDURAL SHORTCOMINGS
-
FEDERAL COURT PROVIDES A CHECKLIST FOR LITIGATION OF COMPENSABLE AND EXCUSABLE DELAY CLAIMS
-
COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS LAYS DOWN LAW ON CPM UPDATES, AWARDING CONTRACTOR EXCUSABLE, BUT NOT COMPENSABLE, DELAY
-
ALLGLASS APPEAL FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
-
GAS COMPANY WINS ROUND AGAINST TWO CONTRACTORS FOR DAMAGING PIPE LINES
-
FAILURE TO DO LEGAL GROUNDWORK SINKS A MECHANICS LIEN CASE
-
RETENTION PAYMENT DISPUTE RESOLVED BY APPEALS COURT
-
LODGE LOG HOMES BLAMES OTHERS FOR DEFECTS, LOWER COURT AGREES, BUT IS CRITICIZED ON APPEAL
-
MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RULES STATE TAX LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL
-
CONTRACTOR, CITY DRAW WRATH OF COURT FOR ILLEGAL CONTRACT CHANGES
-
LIEN AFFIDAVIT REQUIREMENT STRICTLY INTERPRETED
-
SAFETY ISSUES DOG COMPANY’S CONTRACT TO DEMOLISH STADIUM
-
LONG-RUNNING NEGOTIATIONS ON PAVING CONTRACT WIND UP IN COURT AFTER SPAT BETWEEN PRINCIPALS
-
COMPANY RESTRUCTURING WON'T COVER UP BACK DEBT
-
TIME DEADLINE REIGNS SUPREME IN MILLER ACT BOND CLAIMS
-
CONTRACTOR CAN SUE FOR DAMAGES FROM NON-PRIVITY ARCHITECT
-
CONTRACTOR JUMPS GATE AGAIN, AWARD NOT FINAL UNTIL DOCUMENTS EXECUTED
-
MASS. COURT SIDES WITH INSURANCE CARRIER IN EMPLOYEE FRAUD CASE
-
FRAUD CASE CENTERS ON “CONSTRUCTIVE” VERSUS “ACTUAL” KNOWLEDGE DEBATE
-
CONTRACTOR CAN’T COLLECT ON DEBT BASED ON A TECHNICALITY
-
9/11 SECURITY RELATED COST OVERRUNS GO UNRECOVERED
-
NAVY FAILS THREE-POINT TEST IN FRAUD CASE
-
SUBCONTRACTOR RECOVERS TRIAL COSTS FROM 101 JOINT HOMEOWNERS
-
BAD FAITH AND CONTRACT BREACH ARE NO-GO ARGUMENTS FOR IMPLIED CONTRACT DISPUTE
-
CURSORY SITE ANALYSIS NOT ADEQUATE FOR DIFFERING CONDITIONS CASE
-
MACHINE WARNING LABELS NOT ALWAYS GOOD ENOUGH FOR LIABILITY RELEASE
-
OSHA DOESN’T NEED WARRANT FOR PUBLIC PROJECT
-
APPEALS CLAIM CAN’T RIDE COATTAILS OF UNRELATED TRIAL MOTION
-
ARBITRATION BID DENIED BECAUSE PLAINTIFF FAILS TO DO HOMEWORK
-
CHANGE OF VENUE APPEAL DOESN’T CONVINCE COURT
-
CALIFORNIA COURTS UPHOLD PRINCIPLE THAT HIRER’S AGENT NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR INJURY
-
REVOKED LICENSE BRINGS BLIZZARD OF COURT MOTIONS, BUT LITTLE SUBSTANCE
-
APPEALS COURT, LAW UNCERTAIN ON CGL COVERAGE IN DEFECTIVE WORK SUIT
-
COURT CLARIFIES STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FAX-TRANSMITTED CLAIM LETTERS
-
LIMITED RELEASE NOT SUFFICIENT TO BAR CLAIM
-
DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT INTERPRETATION NOT WITHIN ZONE OF REASONABLENESS
-
TRIAL COURT’S DISCHARGE OF $1.7 MILLION LIEN AGAINST GENERAL CONTRACTOR PUT ON HOLD
-
TOWN CAN’T RETROACTIVELY APPLY BUILDING CODES TO ITS EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
-
LAW FIRM LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENTLY DRAFTING CONTRACT
-
BARGE SPILLS STEEL INTO MISSISSIPPI RIVER
-
BOARD AWARDS SOME CHANGES, DENIES DELAY DAMAGES
-
9-DAY LATE NOTICE OF OPTION TRIGGERS TOTAL COST AWARD
-
CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO 727 DAYS OF EICHLEAY DELAY COSTS IN DEFAULT CASE
-
TEXAS RULES PASS-THROUGH CLAIMS ARE PERMISSIBLE
-
RHODE ISLAND’S MECHANICS’ LIEN LAW RULED UNCONSITUTIONAL
-
APPELLATE COURT ALLOWS SUBSEQUENT HOMEOWNERS TO SUE FOR LATENT DEFECTS
-
CONTRACTOR CANNOT RECOVER COSTS FOR MODIFYING FAULTY STEEL FROM BANKRUPT SUBCONTRACTOR’S INSURER
-
ALASKA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS STATE’S ADAPTION OF INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE
-
PERINI CUTS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES BY 56 MORE DAYS ON RECONSIDERATION
-
DON’T DELAY FILING OSHA APPEALS – IT COULD COST YOU
-
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT APPROVED WITHOUT AGENT’S CONSENT
-
PROJECT MANAGER’S INSURER WITHOUT STANDING TO APPEAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
-
CONTRACT BREACH ACTION AGAINST CITY DISMISSED ON SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY GROUNDS
-
INCORRECT WATER-TO-CEMENT RATIO COSTS CONCRETE SUPPLIER $5.4 MILLION
-
CONTRACTOR MISTAKENLY ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUBCONTRACTOR DAMAGE
-
JA JONES ENTITLED TO NEW TRIAL ON CARDINAL-CHANGE THEORY, DESPITE NO-DAMAGE-FOR-DELAY CLAUSE
-
CONTRACTOR HELD NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGED PRODUCT
-
ARCHITECT ALLOWED TO PRACTICE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WITHOUT A CONTRACTOR LICENSE
-
BUILDING PERMIT IRREVOCABLE
-
DEFAMATION SUIT IS LOSE-LOSE PROPOSITION
-
ARBITRATION CLAUSE NOT VALID ON PROPERTY SWITCH
-
CONSULTANT’S REPORT PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER FOIA ATTORNEY-WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE
-
ORAL CONTRACT UPHELD ON COST
-
PRIME CANNOT COMPEL SUBCONTRACTOR TO ARBITRATE
-
AT-WILL EMPLOYEE CANNOT BE TERMINATED FOR COMPLAINTS
-
AMTRAK PREVAILS ON PROTECTION OF PRIVILEGED DATA IN NE CORRIDOR FOIA REQUEST
-
DC CIRCUIT COURT FORBIDS AIR FORCE FROM RELEASING MCDONNELL DOUGLAS’ BID INFORMATION TO LOCKHEED UNDER FOIA
-
CORPORATION MUST BE REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY, HOWEVER, FAILURE TO DO SO IS A CURABLE DEFECT
-
CLAIMS ARISING FROM CRANE MALFUNCTION NOT BARRED BY STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
-
DELAY CLAIM RESULTS IN 94 DAYS COMPENSABLE TIME IN DEFAULT TERMINATION CASE
-
PATENT AMBIGUITY RULING UPHELD
-
CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO ACTUAL COSTS
-
DESIGNER REQUIRED TO PAY $275,000 SETTLEMENT AFTER INSURER FOLDS
-
TOTAL COLLAPSE NOT REQUIRED FOR INSURANCE COVERAGE
-
CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO PAYMENT ON VOIDED CONTRACT
-
BANKRUPT CONTRACTOR’S APPEAL IS PROPERLY BEFORE ASBCA
-
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT DENIES DEPUBLICATION REQUEST
-
US DISTRICT COURT GRANTS SURETY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TO OBTAIN $500,000 COLLATERAL
-
HOME BUYER’S ATTEMPT TO WIN DISPUTE IN BANKRUPTCY COURT NETS BUILDER $6 MILLION IN DAMAGES
-
INSURER REQUIRED TO DEFEND AGAINST MOLD CASE
-
ROOFING CONTRACTOR ENJOINED IN ARBITRATION
-
CONTRACTOR LOSES CLAIM FOR PAYMENT FOR ADDITIONAL WORK NOT COVERED BY CONTRACT
-
PAPERWORK ERROR WON’T KEEP COURT FROM DECIDING UNION’S ALLEGATIONS THAT CONTRACTOR IS VIOLATING PREVAILING WAGE LAW
-
CONTRACTOR KICKED OUT OF COURT FOR FAILING TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
-
SUPREME COURT REVERSES TRIAL COURT’S JUDGMENT AND MONETARY AWARD IN MATERIAL BREACH OF CONTRACT CASE
-
GSA PROPERLY REJECTED AMBIGUOS BID
-
ARMY PROPERLY APPLIED COMPLEX BID EVALUATION SYSTEM
-
BID IMPROPERLY EVALUATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
-
ASBCA PERMITS SUB TO SUE U.S. FOR NON-PAYMENT BY PRIME
-
BOARD UPHOLDS DENIAL OF EICHLEAY DAMAGES AND SETTLEMENT COSTS
-
ASBCA DISMISSES CASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL CIRCUIT REMAND
-
CLARK NEGOTIATES $23 MILLION SETTLEMENT ON $75 MILLION EPA RESEARCH FACILITY CLAIMS
-
COURT UPHOLDS $175 MILLION IN DAMAGES AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST BUT VACATES $36 MILLION IN LEGAL FEES AND $62 MILLION IN LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
-
TURNER PREVAILS ON FIRE RATING INTERPRETATION
-
VETERANS AFFAIRS BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
-
ARCHITECT HAS NO LEGAL BASIS TO SUE CONTRACTORS FOR DAMAGES
-
HOMEOWNERS MAY SUE FOR NEGLIGENCE
-
NO PAY NO WAY
-
CONTRACTOR HAS NO ACTION ON PERFORMANCE BOND FOR PRIOR CONTRACTOR DELAY
-
CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO ADJUSTMENT FOR NEGLIGENTLY ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
-
BOARD DISMISSES USAID TERMINATION CASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICITON
-
MEDIATOR ALLOWED TO TESTIFY IN ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE ACTION
-
COURT REFUSES TO STRIKE MAFIA REFERENCE, DENIES BID PREPARATION COSTS
-
ASBCA DENIES GOVERNMENT’S MOTION ON DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS CLAIM
-
ASBCA DENIES CONTRACTOR DELAY CLAIM; CONTRACTOR NEVER STOPPED WORKING!
-
ASBCA GRANTS SOME, DENIES OTHER GOVERNMENT MOTIONS IN BIFURCATED CLAIM
-
ASBCA DENIES CONTRACTOR’S DELAY CLAIM, FINDING SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CONCURRENT DELAY
-
CONTRACTOR FAILS TO OVERTURN DEFAULT TERMINATION
-
PRIOR OWNER STATUTORILY LIABLE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION OF PROPERTY, NOT STRICT LIABILTY
-
CIRCUIT COURT ALLOWS ADMISSION OF UNTIMELY FILED EXPERT REPORT
-
TANK’S FOOTPRINT DOESN’T COUNT AS USABLE SPACE
-
CONTRACTOR’S LEGAL THEORY STILL FAILS, EVEN THOUGH FIRST BROUGHT ON APPEAL IN DEFECTS CASE
-
APPEALS COURT CLEARS WAY FOR FRAUD IN DEFECTS SUIT
-
MILLER ACT BOND CLAIM FILED TOO LATE
-
LEAKY WINDOWS, NOT LEAKY SPECIFICATION, ACCORDING TO COURT
-
BOARD ALLOWS ONE, DENIES FIVE OF 21 APPEALS ON MORTENSON HOSPITAL PROJECT
-
ASBESTOS REMOVAL WORK NOT IMPROPERLY DIVERTED
-
FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT REJECTS CONSTRUCTIVE ACCELERATION CLAIM
-
COURT INVALIDATES CONTRACTUAL VENUE PROVISION
-
DRYVIT/EIFS SYSTEM FILED ONE WEEK TOO LATE
-
PRE-BID DISCLOSURE DID NOT AFFECT AWARD
-
CONTRACTOR LOSES BID BECAUSE OF COVER LETTER
-
SURETY SUES U.S. FOR OVERPAYING CONTRACTOR AND LOSES
-
SUBCONTRACTOR HAS NO CLAIM BECAUSE IT DEALT WITH THE WRONG GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE
-
UNDERLYING LITIGATION, NOT ARBITRATION AWARD OF ZERO DOLLARS, DETERMINED APPEAL JURISDICTION
-
APPEAL OF ARBITRATION AWARD WAS TIMELY EVEN THOUGH PAYMENT OF FEE WAS NOT
-
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT DOES AWAY WITH BAD LAW ON PRESUMED TIME EXTENSIONS
-
BUILDER'S LIMITED WARRANTY PREVAILS OVER IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS
-
APPELLATE COURT REFUSES TO ASSESS TREBLE DAMAGES AGAINST HOME BUILDER FOR FAULTY CONSTRUCTION
-
LATE FINISH CPM SCHEDULE INVALIDATES BID
-
LACK OF PRIOR JOINT VENTURE EXPERIENCE AND UNCLEAR CPM DEFEATS PROPOSAL
-
SUB-SUB WINS ROUND ONE ON FAILURE TO PAY
-
COURT UPHOLDS LOST PROFITS, PROMPT PAYMENT PENALTIES
-
LOSSES DUE TO LACK OF BONDING CAPACITY NOT COVERED
-
SUBCONTRACTOR’S DESIGN CONSULTANT OWED NO DUTY OF CARE TO OWNER OR GC
-
FEDERAL CLAIMS COURT DENIES CONTRACTOR DELAY DAMAGES AND ORDERS REMITTAL FOR ONLY 21 DAYS OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
-
APPELLATE COURT RULES THAT CONTRACTOR’S LIEN MUST BE ASSESSED AGAINST ALL CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS
-
AN APPELLATE COURT RULES THAT A GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS NOT LIABLE TO A SUPPLIER UNDER A JOINT CHECK AGREEMENT
-
NONVERIFICATION OF EMPLOYEE CREDENTIALS LEADS TO NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD AND BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS
-
NONPAYMENT DUE TO MISINTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT AMENDMENTS
-
COMPLETION AGREEMENT INVALID WITHOUT OWNER’S CONSENT
-
SURETY HELD LIABLE DESPITE DEFAULT DECLARATION
-
CONTRACTORS CANNOT SIMPLY CITE DEFECTIVE DRAWINGS TO JUSTIFY DELAYS
-
DELAYED START RESULTS IN TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT
-
ARBITRATION FAILS CALIFORNIA’S PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
-
INDIANA SUPREME COURT POINTS UP ECONOMIC LOSS RULE
-
COURT NOT ALLOWED TO MODIFY ARBITRATION AWARD
-
CONTRACTOR EFFORT TO PROVE SUPPLIER SUITABILITY FALLS SHORT
-
SECOND-TIER SUBCONTRACTOR CLAIMS BARRED BY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH STATUTORY NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
-
30 DAYS TO ANSWER RFI IS TOO LONG IN PROPRIETARY SPEC ISSUE
-
APPELLATE COURT REFUSES TO DISMISS MEDIATION ORDER
-
APPEALS COURT DENIES INFRINGER PROFITS DESPITE DESIGN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
-
CONTRACTOR DENIED INJUCTIVE RELIEF IN HUBZONE AWARD
-
CONTRACTOR’S CONTRACT INTERPRETATION NOT VALID
-
APPEAL OF GRIFFIN SERVICES, INC.
-
APPEALS OF BILLINGTON CONTRACTING, INC.
-
APPEALS COURT SAYS EVIDENCE OF WILLFUL MISCONDUCT PROVIDES EXCEPTION TO 10-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN CALIFORNIA LAW
-
NOT HEEDING CONTRACT TERMS PROVES COSTLY
-
VIOLATING BASIC CONTRACT LAW PROVES UNWISE
-
FAILURE TO ITEMIZE COSTS IS ITSELF COSTLY
-
APPEALS COURT SIDES WITH PLAINTIFF ON TIMELINESS OF DEFECTIVE WORK CLAIM
-
BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT OVER DEFECTIVE WORKMANSHIP DAMAGES NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR CGL POLICY "OCCURRENCE" CLAUSE
-
DEMO CONTRACTOR WILLFULLY IGNORES OSHA SAFETY REGS; GETS SLAPPED WITH 35 VIOLATIONS
-
CONTRACTOR GETS A BID DO-OVER AFTER BID ANNOUNCEMENT IN SCHOOL PROJECT
-
HOMEOWNER MUST PAY FOR EXTRA WORK DESPITE LACK OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
-
STATE HIGH COURT UNTANGLES LEGAL MESS OF ATTORNEY FEES IN A WIN-WIN
-
DISPUTING CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SENT BACK TO SQUARE ONE—ARBITRATION
-
COURT CAPS WHISTLE BLOWER DEFENSE REIMBURSEMENT AT 80%
-
COURT PULLS OUT CALCULATOR TO AWARD PARTIAL EAJA VERDICT
-
NYC CONTRACTOR FORFEITED CLAIM AGAINST CITY BECAUSE OF TARDY FILING OF NOTICE OF CLAIM
-
CONTRACTOR CAN’T SUE WITH REVOKED CHARTER, COURT RULES
-
NO PAYMENT RELIEF AVAILABLE FOR UNLICENSED CONTRACTORS IN LEGAL DISPUTES
-
CONTRACTOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING SUBCONTRACTOR SAFETY
-
DESIGN FIRM CAN’T DODGE DEBT UNDER GUISE OF NEW OWNERSHIP
-
EARTHQUAKE, LAWSUIT REVEAL STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS IN HOME SALE
-
CONTROVERSIAL “OCCURRENCE” CLAUSE IN CGL POLICY GETS REVIEW
-
UMBRELLA INSURER HAS “PRIMARY DUTY” TO DEFEND DESPITE ADDITIONAL INSURED POLICY
-
CONTRACTOR HAS DUTY TO INQUIRE AT CONTRACT ONSET
-
CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO REQUEST TIME EXTENTIONS PROVES COSTLY
-
CONTRACTOR LOSES OUT ON LIEN CLAIM AGAINST OWNER
-
OUTDATED SUBCONTRACT FORM EXPOSES CONTRACTOR TO SUBSTANTIAL LOSS
-
COURT RULES CONTRACTOR IS TOO GREEDY
-
SURVEYS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET COURT CHALLENGES IN BOUNDARY DISPUTES
-
CONTRACTOR CAN BE LIABLE FOR SUB’S HARASSMENT
-
HIGH COURT DEALS DOUBLE BLOW TO CONTRACTOR FOR FAULTY COURT FILING
-
APPEAL TO AVOID PAYMENT IS REJECTED
-
BIDDING UNDERCUTS DON’T RESULT IN ANTITRUST INJURY
-
COURT BOGS DOWN IN TECHNICALITIES OF SURETY BREACH CASE
-
JILTED BIDDER FAULTED FOR NOT FILING A VALID RELIEF CLAIM
-
SUBCONTRACTOR FINDS OUT THE HARD WAY THAT MILLER ACT DEADLINE IS CONTRACT SPECIFIC
-
COURT FAULTS CONTRACTOR FOR FAILED OBJECTIONS AND INCORRECT FILINGS
-
CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO SUBMIT AFFIDAVIT PRECLUDES RIGHT TO FINAL PAYMENT
-
CONTRACTOR BARRED FROM SUING FOR ITS SUB WITHOUT LIQUIDATING PACT
-
IMMINENT COLLAPSE CAN TRIGGER COVERAGE, DESPITE TEMPORARY SUPPORT
-
SEPARATE SET OF OPERATING FACTS PRECLUDES COLLECTIVE CLAIM
-
COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO RULE ON NON-CERTIFIED CLAIM
-
COURT PATCHES LEAKY ROOF DISPUTE FOR BUILDER AND OWNER
-
CONTRACTOR GETS STUCK IN PERMIT DELAYS ON CONCRETE PROJECT
-
THIRD PARTIES MAY BE LIABLE WITHOUT EXPRESS CONTRACT AGREEMENT
-
ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT COVERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR DESPITE ANTI-INDEMNITY STATUTE IN OREGON
-
COURT PUNISHES PLAINTIFF FOR FILING “FRIVOLOUS” APPEAL
-
APPEALS COURT TURNS DOWN CONTRACTOR’S ATTEMPT TO REVERSE LIEN BOND VERDICT
-
SUB’S SUB LACKS STANDING TO SUE GOVERNMENT AS THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY
-
CONFUSION OVER PIPE OWNERSHIP BRINGS RESPONSIBILITY FOR INJURY BACK TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR
-
INSURANCE COMPANY LIABLE FOR PREEXISTING MOLD DAMAGE
-
ECONOMIC LOSS RULE BARS TORT ACTION IN CONTRACT BREACH SUIT
-
CORRECTION
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
DISTRICT COURT RULES EXCLUSION DAMAGE FROM EARTH MOVEMENT IS NOT LIMITED TO ACTS OF GOD
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
FAULTY COOLING SYSTEM HEATS UP INDEMNITY DISPUTE
-
SUPERINTENDENT HAD NO AUTHORITY TO AWARD SUBCONTRACT
-
CONTRACTOR PAYS SUPPLIERS AFTER SUBCONTRACTOR DEFAULTS
-
AGENCY RECOURSE FOR ALLEGED MINORITY FRONT IS LIMITED
-
VEQ CLAUSE APPLIES TO TOTAL REQUIREMENTS CONTRACT
-
COURT ALLOWS “MEASURED MILE” AND “TOTAL COST” METHODOLOGIES
-
AMBIGUOUS PERCENTAGE OF WORK DOES NOT INVALIDATE SUBCONTRACTING AGREEMENT
-
COST ESTIMATE WAS NOT AN AFFIRMATIVE SITE CONDITION REPRESENTATION
-
ATTORNEY FEE RECOVERY LIMITED TO SURETY BOND
-
ILLINOIS DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS PROGRAM PASSES CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER
-
DISCLAIMER DID NOT PROTECT ENGINEER FROM INSPECTION CLAIM
-
TRIAL COURT CANNOT FORCE PRIVATE MEDIATION ON UNWILLING PARTIES
-
WYOMING HIGH COURT ADDRESSES RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
-
CONTRACTOR’S BID STRUCTURE DEFEATS SITE CONDITION CLAIM
-
PROGRESS PAYMENT APPLICATIONS FOR UNPAID BOND PREMIUMS WERE FRAUDULENT
-
SUB’S CLAIM AGAINST CONTRACTOR WAS SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION WITH PROJECT OWNER
-
WAIVER DID NOT APPLY TO DAMAGED PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF WORK
-
GOVERNMENT’S DESIGN STANDARD CONFLICTED WITH SPECIFIED TESTING PROCEDURE
-
SUBCONTRACTOR HAD NO RIGHT TO PERFORM ADDITIONAL WORK ORDERED BY PROJECT OWNER
-
VIRGINIA HIGH COURT ENFORCES INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE
-
SUPPLIER IS OBLIGATED TO FURNISH FULL REQUIREMENTS OF PROJECT
-
CONTRACTOR’S ARBITRATION RIGHTS SURVIVED DEFAULT TERMINATION
-
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AGREEMENT REQUIRED CONTRACT MODIFICATION
-
FAULTY WORKMANSHIP CONSTITUTES “OCCURENCE” AND “PROPERTY DAMAGE” UNDER “MODERN” CGL POLICY
-
AGENCY PAYS FOR WITHHOLDING INTERNAL SITE CONDITION MEMO
-
SUBCONTRACTOR WAS JUSTIFIED IN ABANDONING WORK
-
LOW BID REJECTED DUE TO FAILURE TO COMMIT TO COLOR SCHEME
-
BIDDER COULD NOT RELY ON SUBCONTRACTOR PRICE QUOTATION
-
DEVELOPER WAS ENTITLED TO “OWNER-BUILDER” LICENSING EXEMPTION
-
CONTRACTOR HAD DUTY TO AVOID HINDERING CO-PRIME CONTRACTOR
-
DISTRIBUTORS OF SPECIFIED PRODUCTS ALLOWED TO REFUSE TO SELL
-
EXPERT’S METHODOLOGY DID NOT WARRANT GOVERNMENT’S FALSE CLAIM ALLEGATION
-
TRAVEL AND SECURITY TIME NOT SUBJECT TO FAIR LABOR LAW
-
INDIANA HIGH COURT DEFINES LIMIT OF PAYMENT BOND PROTECTION
-
CONTRACTOR BREACHED IMPLIED DUTY TO MAKE REASONABLE PROGRESS
-
UNLICENSED CONTRACTOR ALLOWED TO SUE QUALIFYING AGENT
-
STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS ENFORCED
-
CONDO ASSOCIATION ALLOWED TO SUE MATERIAL MANUFACTURER
-
PROJECT OWNER WAIVED RIGHT TO ENFORCE COMPLETION DEADLINE
-
LISTED SUBCONTRACTOR LACKED LEGAL RECOURSE AFTER REPLACEMENT
-
COMPRESSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE WAS NOT A PROJECT “BETTERMENT”
-
TIME AND MATERIALS COMPENSATION LIMITED BY TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
-
SUBCONTRACTOR NOT REQUIRED TO ASSERT MECHANIC’S LIEN RIGHTS
-
SUBCONTRACTOR GAINED DIRECT PAYMENT RIGHTS AGAINST GOVERNMENT
-
WITHHOLDING FOR DISPUTED WORK LIMITED TO SCOPE OF INVOICE
-
DEFAULT TERMINATION FOR INSUFFICIENT PROGRESS UPHELD
-
CONTRACTOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SUB’S SAFETY PRACTICES DESPITE CONTRACT LANGUAGE
-
PLAINTIFFS MUST HAVE FACTUAL BASIS FOR CLAIM TO SEEK RELIEF
-
CONTRACTOR WAS “PREVAILING PARTY” BUT ATTORNEY FEES DENIED
-
MANAGEMENT SERVICES WERE NOT “LABOR” UNDER MILLER ACT
-
RECIPROCAL WAIVER APPLIED TO INSURED LOSSES AFTER FINAL PAYMENT
-
OWNER INVOLVEMENT DID NOT WAIVE TESTING REQUIREMENT
-
PROJECT OWNER’S PAYMENT PROMISE TO SUBCONTRACTOR ENFORCED
-
CONTRACTOR’S CLAUSE PRECLUDED COMMITMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN SUBCONTRACT
-
WEBSITE POSTING DID NOT FULFILL STATUTORY NOTICE REQUIREMENT
-
CHANGE ORDER MARK-UP FOR OVERHEAD COVERED EXTENDED FIELD COSTS
-
PRIME NOT ALLOWED TO WITHHOLD PAYMENT ON APPROVED SUBCONTACTOR APPLICATIONS
-
ANTI-BID SHOPPING PENALTIES CANNOT BE IMPOSED BY COURTS
-
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES OF 50 PERCENT PRICE REDUCTION ENFORCED
-
PROJECT OWNER’S CONDUCT WAIVED WRITTEN CHANGE ORDER REQUIREMENT
-
OMISSION OF LABEL ON DRAWINGS DID NOT NEGATE SPECIFICATIONS
-
CONVENIENCE TERMINATION COSTS INCLUDE UNSUBMITTED CLAIMS
-
OWNER’S ACCORD AND SATISFACTION NO MATCH FOR CONTRACTOR’S CHANGE ORDER NIGHTMARE
-
IOWA EXPANDS IMPLIED WARRANTY LIABILITY OF HOME BUILDERS
-
AIA INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSES DID NOT APPLY TO BURIED CABLE BREAK
-
LOST PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY NOT SHOWN BY GOVERNMENT DELAY
-
CARELESS CONTRACT EXECUTION CREATES PAYMENT HASSLE
-
MISSISSIPPI HIGH COURT ENFORCES QUANTITY ESTIMATE DISCLAIMER
-
SOIL TEST LOGS WERE CONTRADICTED BY OTHER AFFIRMATIVE REPRESENTATIONS
-
ANTI-ASSIGNMENT LANGUAGE DID NOT IMPAIR SURETY’S RIGHTS AGAINST OWNER
-
NEW YORK COURT SORTS OUT AMBIGUOUS UNIT-PRICED LINE ITEMS
-
LIEN CLAIM DID NOT HAVE TO LIMIT PROPERTY ACREAGE
-
OCCASIONAL DEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFICATIONS DID NOT ESTABLISH BREACH OF WARRANTY
-
BID GUARANTEE ASSETS MUST BE CAPABLE OF ESCROW
-
WRONGFUL TERMINATION RESULTED FROM SPECIFIED CODE VIOLATION
-
“AS IS” CLAUSE RULED AMBIGUOUS AND ILLUSORY
-
LOW BID REJECTED DUE TO SBE NONCOMPLIANCE EVEN THOUGH MUNICIPAL CODE WOULD HAVE ALLOWED ACCEPTANCE
-
NEBRASKA HIGH COURT APPLIES AIA WAIVER CLAUSE TO ALL INSURED PROPERTY
-
NON-ASSIGNMENT CLAUSE DID NOT VOID ASSIGNMENTS
-
COMPLETION DATE WAS NOT UNDISCLOSED BID EVALUATION FACTOR
-
LOW BID REJECTED DUE TO MINOR WAGE VIOLATIONS
-
OWNER RECOVERS DAMAGES THAT EXCEED CONTRACT PRICE OR PURCHASE PRICE OF BUILDING
-
LATE DELIVERY OF BID ATTRIBUTED TO BIDDER RATHER THAN AGENCY
-
“TYPICAL” DRAWING NOTE APPLIED ONLY UNDER IDENTICAL CONDITIONS
-
CONTRACTOR COULD NOT RECOVER PAYMENT FROM PROPERTY MANAGER
-
CALIFORNIA HIGH COURT ADDRESSES SUBCONTRACTOR’S “DUTY TO DEFEND”
-
IMPROVEMENTS WERE NOT VISIBLE SO LIEN DID NOT TAKE PRIORITY
-
UNION TRUST COULD NOT RECOVER UNPAID CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PAYMENT BOND
-
CONTRACTOR ALLOWED TO PURSUE LOST PROFIT INCURRED DUE TO PERFORMANCE BOND CLAIM
-
PROCURING AGENCY USED IMPROPER UNDISCLOSED EVALUATION CRITERIA
-
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES WERE NOT “LOSS OF USE” FOR PURPOSES OF INSURANCE COVERAGE
-
PROMPT PAYMENT ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO UNPRICED CHANGE ORDERS
-
MECHANIC’S LIEN WAIVER DID NOT COVER PAYMENT FOR EXTRA WORK
-
COURT DECLINES TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD DESPITE QUESTIONS REGARDING ARBITRATOR NONDISCLOSURE
-
CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS PROCEDURE PROVIDED EXCLUSIVE REMEDY
-
OWNER NOT ENTITLED TO ADJUST UNIT PRICES ON QUANTITY OVERRUNS
-
EXPERIENCE OF PARENT COMPANY PROPERLY DISREGARDED DURING PROPOSAL EVALUATION
-
HAZARDOUS WASTE REMEDIATION COVERED BY MECHANIC?S LIEN STATUTE
-
CONSTRUCTION LOAN SAFEGUARDS LENDER, NOT HOMEOWNER
-
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ALLOWED REDUCTION OF RETAINAGE BELOW FIVE PERCENT
-
CLAIM AGAINST ENGINEER EXTINGUISHED 5 YEARS AFTER COMPLETION
-
CONTRACTOR?S OWNER HELD PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR VIOLATION OF STATE PROMPT PAYMENT ACT
-
EQUIPMENT OWNERSHIP COULD NOT BE DUPLICATED IN FIELD OVERHEAD
-
ON-SITE ACTIVITIES COULD EXPOSE CONSULTANT TO LIABILITY FOR DEFICIENT CONSTRUCTION WORK
-
LIMITATIONS PERIOD STARTED UPON ACCEPTANCE OF SUB'S WORK
-
LIMITATION OF DELAY DAMAGES ENFORCED
-
LIEN COULD NOT ATTACH TO PRIVATELY FINANCED 1 USE PROPERTY
-
NO FINAL BILL OR DEFINITIVE CONTRACT PRICE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN LIEN
-
EXCUSABLE DELAY MUST BE CONSIDERED IN LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSMENT
-
CONTRACTOR CRITICIZED FOR LATE CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATION
-
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR BARRED FROM SPLITTING CLAIM BETWEEN SEPARATE COURTS
-
STATE AGENCY LIABLE TO UNPAID SUB FOR FAILURE TO ASSURE APPROPRIATE PAYMENT BOND
-
OFF-SITE STEEL FABRICATOR CHARACTERIZED AS SUBCONTRACTOR
-
OWNER’S CHANGE ORDER PAYMENT GUARANTEE ENFORCEABLE BY SUB
-
SUB LOST RIGHT TO CHALLENGE DEDUCTIVE CHANGE ORDER CREDIT
-
CONTRACTOR ASSESSED $10,000 PER DAY IN “MOTORIST INCONVENIENCE” COSTS
-
PENNSYLVANIA HIGH COURT ALLOWS COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION FOR CONSTRUCTION TRADE CONTRACTS
-
TUCKER ACT’S SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY WAIVER ALLOWS PAYMENT BOND SURETY TO SUE GOVERNMENT
-
OWNER’S FAILURE TO TRANSFER CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE TO CORPORATION RESULTS IN FORFEITURE OF RIGHT TO COLLECT PAYMENT
-
NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT ADDRESSES LIENABLE IMPROVEMENTS
-
CONTRACTING OFFICER MAY HAVE RATIFIED ACTIONS OF SUBORDINATE
-
MISREPRESENTATION OF SCOPE OF WORK RESULTS IN RESCISSION OF SUBCONTRACT
-
“CONTROL OF THE PREMISES” DID NOT MAKE PRIME RESPONSIBLE FOR SUB’S SAFETY PRACTICES
-
ATTACHMENT ORDER NOT VALID ON BREACH OF CONTRACT SUIT
-
TEXAS COURT GIVES RESERVED OK FOR EXPERT SIDE-SWITCHING
-
CONTRACTOR ALLOWED TO RECOVER FOR IMPAIRED BONDING CAPACITY
-
CONTRACTOR AWARDED $27.1 MILLION IN WRONGFUL
-
DISAPPOINTED BIDDER MAY SEEK LOST PROFIT AFTER MINORITY SUBCONTRACTING PREFERENCES RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL
-
LISTING OF SUBCONTRACTORS IMPLIED PROHIBITION ON SUBSTITUTION
-
CONDITION OF FUEL TANK WAS A TYPE II DIFFERING SITE CONDITION
-
CONTRACTOR FAILED TO EXAMINE REFERENCED BORING LOGS
-
UTILITY DELAY DAMAGE DISCLAIMER RULED UNENFORCEABLE
-
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER BORE RISK OF LATE STEEL DELIVERIES AND WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR ACCELERATION COSTS
-
SUBCONTRACTOR OBLIGATED BY PERFORMANCE BOND PROPOSAL
-
CONTRACTOR DENIED DESIGN DEFICIENCY COSTS DUE TO INADEQUATE NOTICE OF CLAIM
-
CONTRACTOR HELD RESPONSIBLE UNDER “WARRANTY OF CONSTRUCTION” CLAUSE
-
CONTRACTOR WINS $38.4M AGAINST CITY IN CONTRACT BREACH AND CIVIL RIGHTS SUIT
-
SUBCONTRACTOR’S TERMINATION RECOVERY NOT LIMITED BY LINE ITEM PRICES
-
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY LEASED TO DEVELOPER NOT SUBJECT TO LIEN
-
GENERAL CONDITIONS APPLY EVEN THOUGH NOT PHYSICALLY PRESENT
-
CONTRACTOR WAITS TOO LONG TO FILE CLAIMS FOR DELAYS AND CHANGE ORDERS
-
OWNER DID NOT WITHHOLD SUPERIOR KNOWLEDGE BECAUSE CONTRACT WAS CONSISTENT WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
-
HOMEOWNERS THROWN OUT OF COURT FOR FAILURE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS
-
CONVERSATIONS CAN SUPPLEMENT WRITTEN PAYMENT BOND NOTICE
-
AGENCY ALLOWED TO ACCEPT PORTION OF BID DESPITE STATED INTENT TO THE CONTRARY
-
CONTRACTOR COULD NOT RELY ON BORING LOGS WHILE IGNORING NARRATIVE REPORT
-
BID PROTEST SETTLEMENT PREQUALIFIED SUBCONTRACTOR
-
“ACTIVE INTERFERENCE” WAS EXCEPTION TO ENFORCEABILITY OF NO-DAMAGE-FOR-DELAY CLAUSE
-
CONTRACTOR DENIED EICHLEAY DAMAGES FOR UNABSORBED HOME OFFICE OVERHEAD
-
STATE LICENSING COMPLIANCE RULED A QUESTION FOR ARBITRATION
-
SUBCONTRACTOR PRICE DISCOUNTS RAISE QUESTIONS OF ANTI-KICKBACK VIOLATIONS
-
SUPPLIER CANNOT RECOVER PAYMENT FROM PROJECT OWNER WHEN BOND PROVES WORTHLESS
-
CONTRACTOR DENIED CUMULATIVE IMPACT COSTS DUE TO LATE NOTICE OF CLAIM
-
FIRST AMENDMENT FREE SPEECH PROTECTS BIDDER AGAINST RETALIATION FOR PRIOR CLAIM
-
JOINT CHECKS COMPROMISED CONTRACTOR’S RECOURSE AGAINST SUB’S PERFORMANCE BOND
-
CONTRACTOR ABSORBS SHARP INCREASE IN MATERIAL COSTS DESPITE ARGUMENT OF IMPRACTICABILITY
-
ARBITRATION CLAUSE SO ONE-SIDED IT COULD NOT BE ENFORCED
-
WORKER SLOWDOWN DOES NOT WARRANT EXCUSABLE DELAY FOR SUBCONTRACTOR
-
BOARD FINDS CONTRACT PROVISION PLAIN AND UNAMBIGUOUS
-
SMALL BUSINESS FIRM’S LOW BID REJECTED DUE TO INCOMPLETE PAPERWORK
-
BONDING AGENT NOT OBLIGATED TO TELL SURETY OF CONTRACTOR’S CLAIM HISTORY
-
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ELECTRICAL CABLE DESPITE OWNER’S FAILURE TO TEST
-
BUILDER ORDERED TO REMEDY LEAKY PROBLEM
-
INSURER WINS WATER DAMAGE CASE AFTER RAISING CERTIFIED ISSUE ON APPEAL
-
COLORADO COURT RELIES ON PLAIN LANGUAGE FOR CGL POLICY INTERPRETATION
-
HASTILY PREPARED BID DOOMS HIGHWAY CONTRACTOR
-
CONTRACTOR DOESN’T HAVE TO RETURN REFUNDED PERMIT FEES TO SCHOOL DISTRICT
-
CONTRACTOR FOOTS BILL FOR ROCK BUTTRESSES ON ROADWAY PROJECT
-
CGL POLICY COVERS DAMAGE CAUSED BY DEFECTIVE WINDOWS
-
OWNER HELD PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR WRONGFUL PAYMENT AFTER RECEIVING A LIEN NOTICE
-
FEE RECOVERY NOT ALLOWED WHEN NEGOTIATION SWITCHES TO LITIGATION
-
GOVERNMENT MISSES OPPORTUNITY TO TERMINATE CONTRACT FOR DEFAULT
-
PUNCH LIST DOES NOT ESTABLISH EXISTENCE OR EXTENT OF ALLEGED DAMAGES
-
SUBCONTRACTOR MUST PAY OWNER FOUR TIMES AMOUNT OF COST OF JOB
-
HOMEOWNER’S CLAIMS AGAINST ARBITRATOR GET NO SYMPATHY FROM COURTS
-
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HALTS PROSECUTION’S ATTEMPT TO CONVICT CONTRACTORS OF THEFT
-
COURT ALLOWS CONTRACTOR TO PURSUE CLAIM FOR DOWNTIME
-
ROCK PAPER SCISSORS GAVEL
-
TIME RUNS OUT FOR PAVING CONTRACTOR TO FILE SUIT
-
HOMEOWNERS HALT PAYMENTS CITING UNPROFESSIONAL WORK
-
NEGLIGENT DAMAGE MAY WARRANT FULL REPLACEMENT COST MINUS OWNER-CAUSED DEPRECIATION
-
STALLED APPEAL RESPONSE FROM GOVERNMENT NETS WIN FOR CONTRACTOR
-
‘DESIGN’ AND ‘PERFORMANCE’ DISTINCTION NOT NECESSARILY RELEVANT IN ASSESSING DEFECT CLAIM
-
CONTRACT SPECIFICS TRUMP GENERAL CLAUSES IN DIFFERING SITE DISPUTE
-
SCHEDULING DEVIATIONS COST CONTRACTOR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND DELAY CLAIM
-
CORPORATION CLAIMS IT IS NOT SUBJECT TO STATE JOBSITE INSPECTIONS
-
INSURER AND INSURED BOTH REQUIRED TO EXERCISE GOOD FAITH
-
CONSTRUCTION NOTICE REQUIREMENT TRIPS UP CONTRACTOR
-
SIX-YEAR STATUE OF LIMITATIONS APPLIES TO SURETY BOND CLAIM
-
CONTRACTOR’S PURSUIT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGED EQUIPMENT PAYS OFF
-
FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE STYMIES PLUMBING FIRM
-
NO DELAY RECOVERY FOR CONTRACTOR THAT IGNORED CONTRACT
-
CONCRETE FLAWS LEAD TO COMPLICATED LITIGATION
-
WAIVER OF SUBROGATION CLAUSE IS ‘OBSCURELY DRAFTED’
-
CHURCH FAILS TO OVERTURN UNSIGNED ARBITRATION PACT
-
ERRORS ON MECHANICS’ LIEN PRECLUDE COST RECOVERY
-
NO RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS WITH STUCCO PROBLEMS
-
CONTRACTOR’S WIN ON AN EIFS DAMAGE CASE IS AN EMPTY VICTORY
-
DEFECTIVE EIFS INSTALLATION QUALIFIES AS “OCCURRENCE”
-
CONTRACTOR CANNOT COLLECT PREJUDGMENT INTEREST ON LOST PROFITS
-
INSURER HAS NO DUTY TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY FOR DEFECT CASE
-
EVIDENCE SPOLIATION SPOILS OWNER’S WATER LEAK CASE
-
LACK OF CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP BARS NEGLIGENCE SUIT
-
ENVIRONMENTAL FIRM WAITS TOO LONG TO FILE APPEAL
-
NO RETALIATION INVOLVED IN REJECTED BID, SAYS GAO OFFICE
-
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S ASSUMPTION PROVES COSTLY
-
HOMEOWNER BOUND BY ZONING ORDINANCE DESPITE CITY’S WAIVER
-
COURT UPHOLDS CITY’S RIGHT TO CANCEL CONTRACT
-
PROCUREMENT VIOLATION DOES NOT YIELD COMPENSATION FOR IRKED BIDDER
-
FREE MATERIAL FOR PAVING JOB IS NO DEAL
-
CONTRACTOR CANNOT BLAME DIFFERING SITE CLAIM ON OWNER’S PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS
-
CONTRACTOR MAY BE LIABLE FOR COPYRIGHT VIOLATION FOR EXCEEDING LICENSED USE OF DESIGN PLANS
-
LAB ACCEPTS ‘PAID IN FULL’ SATISFACTION WHEN IT CASHES PARTIAL PAYMENT CHECK
-
APPEALS COURT AFFIRMS THAT RESORT OWNER WAIVED DEADLINE
-
ELECTION DOCTRINE DOES NOT PRECLUDE FILING OF ‘PROTECTIVE’ SUITS IN FEDERAL CLAIMS COURT
-
CONTRACTOR CAN’T RECOVER FOR LOST PROFITS
-
ANTI-COMPETITIVE CLAIM REJECTED IN PUBLIC CONTRACT DISPUTE
-
WIDOW CAN’T PROVE CAUSATION IN SCAFFOLDING ACCIDENT
-
LEAD ABATEMENT CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVE PROPER RELIANCE ON HISTORICAL DATA
-
COURT FAULTS PRIMARY EMPLOYER FOR SAFETY VIOLATIONS THAT LED TO ‘LEASED’ WORKER’S DEATH
-
ALJ DOESN’T BUY CONTRACTOR’S EXCUSES FOR OSHA VIOLATIONS
-
CONTRACTOR DRAWS WRATH FROM APPEALS COURT FOR MISUSING ARBITRATION
-
PARTY GETS ATTORNEY FEES WITHOUT ASKING
-
COURT REJECTS CONTRACTOR’S PAYMENT WAIVER ARGUMENT
-
APPEALS COURT OK’S NEW TRIAL FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS
-
COURTS REJECT BIG EASY’S ATTEMPT TO BYPASS STATE BIDDING LAW
-
COURT AFFIRMS DAMAGES FOR CRACKED FOUNDATION BUT REDUCES AWARD
-
COURT DISMISSES ARCHITECT FROM CONTRACT BREACH AND TORT SUIT
-
INSURER CAN’T COLLECT FEES ON BEHALF OF SUSPENDED CORPORATION
-
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TO JOB EQUIPMENT FALLS OUTSIDE SCOPE OF INSURER’S PERFORMANCE BOND
-
LACK OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE PROVIDES BASIS FOR SUCCESSFUL APPEAL
-
INCOMPLETE RECORDS PROVE COSTLY FOR CONTRACTOR PURSUING DELAY-RELATED CLAIMS
-
CRANE CONTRACTOR RUNS INTO DIFFICULTIES PROVING START OF LIMITATIONS STATUTE
-
SCOPE OF POLLUTION EXCLUSION CLAUSES REMAINS SUBJECT OF DEBATE IN STATE, FEDERAL COURTS
-
INSURER DENIES COVERAGE IN SUIT THAT ALLEGES DEFECTIVE WORK
-
ILLEGAL WORKERS CAN COLLECT LOST WAGES IN NEW YORK
-
UNION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCRIMINATORY CONDUCT, SAYS APPEALS COURT
-
CONTRACTOR’S ARGUMENT WON’T HOLD WATER AGAINST CGL CARRIER IN WATER DAMAGE CASE
-
HONESTY PROVES COSTLY FOR INSURANCE COMPANY TRYING TO AVOID CLAIM PAYOUTS
-
LANDOWNERS MUST DISCLOSE KNOWLEDGE OF CONCEALED HAZARDS TO INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
-
PAY-IF-PAID EFFECT TRICKLES DOWN WHEN OWNER GOES BELLY UP
-
PROJECT DELAYS MAY WARRANT COST RECOVERY AGAINST SURETY
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
KIMMEL CENTER AND VINOLY SETTLE LAWSUIT
-
SCHOOL BOARD CAN EXERCISE BIDDING FLEXIBILITY, COURTS SAY
-
TEXAS COURT APPLIES EIGHT CORNERS RULE TO DETERMINE DEFENSE AND INDEMNITY COVERAGE
-
TIME RUNS OUT FOR ILLINOIS VENTURE AFTER THREE APPEALS IN BID PROTEST SUIT
-
DEVELOPER SECURES PARTIAL WIN AGAINST STUCCO SUPPLIER
-
COURT DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN CONTRIBUTION AND INDEMNITY CLAIMS
-
HOUSING PROJECT IS NOT PUBLIC WORK, SAYS APPEALS COURT
-
CONTRACTOR FILES FOR BANKRUPTCY AFTER FAILING TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY, EVIDENCE
-
CONSTRUCTION DELAY IS INHERENT RISK, NOT INSURABLE “ACCIDENT”
-
SCHOOL BOARD FINDS LOOPHOLE TO AVOID PAYING EXTRA WORK CLAIMS
-
STATE CONTRACT LAW FAVORS ROOFER IN NON-PAYMENT SUIT
-
OWNER’S RECOVERY SUIT AGAINST INSURER LACKS TRIABLE ISSUE
-
VERBAL AND WRITTEN CONTRACTS CAUSE CONFUSION IN CONTRACT BREACH CASE
-
CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO COMPY WITH STATE MANUAL RESULTS IN ACCIDENT LIABILITY
-
SURETIES’ FAILURES TO NOTIFY DO NOT MERIT CLAIM DENIAL
-
HIGH COURT APPROVES ORAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTIES FOR ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE
-
FEDERAL CLAIMS COURT AFFIRMS SURETY’S LONG-STANDING RIGHT OF EQUITABLE SUBROGATION
-
WORKER DENIED COMP COVERAGE FOR OUT-OF-STATE CLAIM
-
ARCHITECT AND ARTS CENTER FAIL TO MAKE MUSIC TOGETHER
-
UNAUTHORIZED CLAIM DENIAL LETTER WON’T STAND UP IN COURT
-
CONTRACTOR WITHOUT A CONTRACT FAILS TO RECOVER AGAINST COUNTY
-
BRIEFLY NOTED
-
DISTRICT COURT UPHOLDS AWARD FOR ATTORNEY DAMAGES
-
NO IMMUNITY FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN SUB’S INJURY CASE
-
CGL POLICY WON’T COVER FAULTY WORKMANSHIP
-
NEGLIGENT INSTALLATION FALLS WITHIN CGL EXCLUSION FOR INJURY CLAIM
-
CONTRACTOR NEEDS PERMISSION TO CHANGE DBE SUBCONTRACTOR ON GOVERNMENT PROJECT
-
COST SHARING PERCENTAGES DON’T APPLY TO REIMBURSABLE COSTS FOR CANCELED CONTRACT
-
MANUFACTURER SUES COMPETITOR FOR INFRINGING ON ITS TURF
-
SOUTH AFRICAN COURT DISMISSES $2.5M NEGLIGENCE SUIT AGAINST ENGINEERS
-
ORIGINAL OPINION STANDS IN DAM REHABILITATION CASE
-
“GOOD FAITH” DEFENSE NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO UPHOLD AGENCY’S ACTIONS
-
PARENT COMPANY’S EXPERIENCE DOESN’T SATISFY RESPONSIBILITY CRITERION FOR BRANCH’S BID
-
MULTIPLE SALES OF DEFECTIVE GOODS TOTAL ONE “OCCURRENCE” IN CGL POLICY
-
ARBITRATION AWARDS DON’T MERIT PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
-
CONTRACT TERMINATION COSTS FILED TOO LATE
-
SUB’S DEFECTIVE WORK QUALIFIES AS “OCCURRENCE” IN CONTRACTOR’S CGL POLICY
-
CONTRACTOR LOSES CASE TO REDUCE LIQUIDATED DELAY DAMAGES
-
SUBCONTRACTOR NOT BOUND TO ITS MISTAKEN BID PRICE, BUT PRIOR COURSE OF DEALING COULD ESTABLISH BREACH OF CONTRACT
-
LICENSURE IN CALIFORNIA: THE PROOF IS IN THE PLEADINGS
-
CONSTRUCTION-RELATED DAMAGE DOES NOT LEAD TO STATE OR FEDERAL TAKINGS VIOLATION
-
APPEALS COURT REJECTS REQUEST TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
-
NAVY SPECIFICATIONS TRUMP INDUSTRY STANDARDS IN CONTRACT AMBIGUITY BATTLE
-
FEDERAL CONTRACTOR COLLECTS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX REFUND FROM COUNTY
-
CONTRACTOR LEARNS THE HARD WAY THAT SITE VISITS ARE PART OF THE JOB
-
BUILDER CAN’T ARBITRARILY REQUIRE ARBITRATION
-
COURT CAN’T COMPEL ARBITRATION IF PARTIES DON’T WANT IT
-
ELEMENTS COLLIDE TO CREATE INSURANCE DISAGREEMENT
-
SMALL CLAIMS CASE IS NO EASY RIDE FOR CARPET COMPANY
-
CONTRACTOR GETS STUCK IN LEGAL MIRE OVER LEVEE PROJECT
-
COMPANY SUES GOVERNMENT FOR INTERFERING WITH CONTRACT
-
CONRACTOR CAN’T SUE FEDS AS PREEMPTIVE STRIKE AGAINST FUTURE ASBESTOS LIABILITY CLAIMS
-
INSURANCE FIRM CLEARED FROM DEFENDING SUBCONTRACTOR IN FAULTY PRODUCT SUIT
-
THE CLOCK RUNS OUT FOR PAYMENT BOND CLAIMS IN STADIUM PROJECT
-
DUTY TO FURNISH PAYMENT BOND ON PUBLIC WORK
-
FAILURE TO INCORPORATE SCHEDULE SINKS LOCK AND DAM CLAIM; GOVERNMENT GETS 84 DAYS CREDIT IN REVERSE DELAY CASE
-
CONTRACTOR ENTITLED TO EAJA ATTORNEYS’ FEES ON CONTRACT INTERPRETATION ISSUE
-
COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS "FACTORING"
-
SUBCONTRACTOR UNDER ILLEGAL CONTRACT ENTITLED TO RESTITUTION
-
PROPER MEASURE OF DAMAGES MAY BE THE COST TO REPAIR
-
UNDERCUT - RECOMMENDATION OR REQUIREMENT
-
JOINT VENTURE UNINSURED; JV PARTNER LEFT HOLDING THE BAG
-
GENERAL CONTRACTOR’S INSURER NOT LIABLE TO SUBCONRACTOR’S INSURER
-
INSURER HAD DUTY TO DEFEND IN COLLAPSE CASE
-
JOINT CHECK ARRANGEMENT DOES NOT WAIVE SUPPLIER’S RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM A CONTRACTOR’S SURETY
-
NOTICE IS KEY WHEN ENFORCING CONTRACTS
-
QUASI CONTRACT IS ENOUGH FOR SUBCONTRACTOR TO BE PAID FOR SERVICES
-
BOARD REJECTS DELAY CLAIM AND AWARDS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
-
DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR PAYS TREBLE DAMAGES FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS
-
SLOW DAY AT THE BENCH. MAJORITY CHASTISES OPINIONATED JUDGE
-
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SAYS FRAUD ACT CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITHIN SEVEN YEARS OF THE ORIGINAL CLAIM
-
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OVERTURNS ASBCA AWARD FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
-
GAO Rules Agency’s Evaluation of Subcontractor Conformed to Procurement Rules
-
PRICE/TECHNICAL TRADEOFF DETERMINATION UPHELD
-
CLAIM NOTICE DID NOT COVER LOST LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
-
CONTRACTOR’S SWORN STATEMENT WAS NOT ASSURANCE OF SUBCONTRACTOR PAYMENT
-
PROSPECTIVE SUBCONTRACTOR COULD NOT CHALLENGE AWARD DECISION
-
FAILURE TO NAME ARCHITECT RENDERED AIA DOCUMENT AMBIGUOUS
-
DELETED WORK WAS NOT INCLUDED IN SUBCONTRACT
-
NUMERICAL SCORING DID NOT INDICATE "MECHANICAL" EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL
-
BOARD ADDRESSES DELETED LABOR AND MATERIAL COSTS
-
SUB PROVED BREACH BUT NOT COST OF COMPLETION
-
PRIME AND SUB NOT LIABLE FOR BENEFIT CONTRIBUTIONS OF LOWER-TIER SUB
-
HIGHWAY CONTRACTOR RECOVERS DELAY DAMAGES AFTER WRONGFUL REJECTION OF MIX FORMULA
-
PREVAILING WAGE APPLIED ONLY TO ON-SITE LABOR
-
BOARD ADDRESSES MILESTONE COMPLETION DATES AND SUPERIOR SCHEDULING KNOWLEDGE
-
LIENS FOR DEMOLITION CLARIFIED IN CALIFORNIA
-
CONTRACTOR RESERVED WEATHER DELAY CLAIM FROM GLOBAL RELEASE
-
ROLE OF MATERIALS/SUPPLIES DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF PREVAILING WAGE LAW
-
Volume 5 - Number 49 | December 10, 2007
-
Volume 5 - Number 48 | December 3, 2007
-
Past Issues
-
Sample Issue
-
Editorial Board
-
Construction Claims Reference Library
-
Bookstore
-
Directory
-
Construction Law Sites
|
